Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Blandino: If it's questionable, it's incomplete (let replay fix it)

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

motocross_cat Community Regular

motocross_cat

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

but then you have to determine if the ball hitting the ground is a fumble or an incomplete pass

Ok.

Ball touch ground after 4 steps = fumble

Ball touch ground before 4 steps = incomplete. 

My point is they are making some of these rules waaaaaayyyy to grey for no real reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Hammerin'Cameron34 said:

Lol yet this is ruled a catch. This is an outstanding catch and I think should be ruled a catch. But by what blandino said, what a joke

If the Bengals receiver makes a play like that its not ruled a catch cause its the lowly Bengals, small market Cinci

Large market, big fan base, Pittsburgh would get more revenue than Cinci would with a win which trickles down to the leagues wallet 

The head of officiating said the next day that the play should've been an incomplete pass. I thought it was incomplete right after it happened. I don't understand how refs could miss something this easy. It just proves they heavily favor some teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cj72 Newbie

Cj72

Posted
Posted

I see 2 major flaws with this 

1 nobody knows what a catch is anymore. Even if reviewed 75 times

2 there is a limited number of challenges so even if you get lucky and get it right everytime, you are screwed if it happens 4 or 5 times in a game.

 

I guess they will have to save all challenges for passes and not challenge anything else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Bryce stats past the sticks

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • NAS
      NFL other games

      By NAS · Posted

      Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • tukafan21
      Bryce stats past the sticks

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...