Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Talking Panthers on the radio...

Jeremy Igo

By Jeremy Igo,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted

Cut Voth some slack. He's from the land of Cleve, so it's hard for him to be positive about anything football-related. Not in the DNA up there

Have to disagree with Wegher needing to make the team by beating Whittaker. We carried 5 players in the RB/FB group last year, and didn't bring in much competition besides UDFA FB Rockhead Badbackson, and he's not making the club from the tub. Playing time is a different story, but Wegher's roster spot is secure. Until it isn't.

Sanchez resembles Ricky Manning, Jr., huh? I was thinking Captain Munnerlyn, since Ricky's career went downhill fast when the downfield contact rules were changed because of Ricky's thuggery in the Iggles playoff game. Captain is a little less rough, and Sanchez doesn't have the meat on his bones, yet, to be close to how physical Ricky was, much less Captain.

Overall good marks for the interview. Area of focus would be practice your elocution. Too many stumbles on "He", and overuse of "you know". Let your considerable knowledge of our Panthers show with clarity and confidence, and you'll sound more professional than the guys at WFNZ who get paid to publicly speak.

Hope that's worded constructively.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Well,  that's as good as I get at 7:30 am with only one cup of coffee. :) 

Pretty good considering. Keep striving for improvement, tho, like Cam, Luke, etc. That's the price of becoming a public figure. Look forward to your next radio stint

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jeremy Igo Newbie

Jeremy Igo

Posted
  • Author
Posted
14 minutes ago, O-Ther said:

Pretty good considering. Keep striving for improvement, tho, like Cam, Luke, etc. That's the price of becoming a public figure. Look forward to your next radio stint

I plan on modeling my fame less on Luke and more on Charlie Sheen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
arbnranger Explorer

arbnranger

Posted
Posted

Hey @Jeremy Igo seriously nice work. I remember last year it seemed like they were trying to "squeeze you in" sometimes. This year, they seem very supportive and happy for the insight you give. You gave some solid behind the scenes perspective from a knowledgeable panther fan and "reporter". Nice calm demeanor that added carolinahuddle.com at the right moments. Keep doing work like that and we may have a big wig on our hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jon Snow
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Jon Snow · Posted

      I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • strato
      OFFICIAL 2026 Undrafted Free Agent Thread

      By strato · Posted

      Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • outlaw4
      Dan had a great draft

      By outlaw4 · Posted

      If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...