Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which one of you did this to Mike Remmers's Wikipedia page?


the butch

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Kind of true.  

Mike Remmers was a big part of our getting to the Super Bowl last year.

If you want to judge him solely by that one game, you're gonna have to bag on several other players as well, including a guy named Newton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Mike Remmers was a big part of our getting to the Super Bowl last year.

If you want to judge him solely by that one game, you're gonna have to bag on several other players as well, including a guy named Newton.

If Remmers didn't get destroyed all game, along with Oher.  Cam doesn't play as bad.  Remmers was putrid Super Bowl Sunday.  Sadly, that will happen again the first game of the season as well, if he's starting.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

If Remmers didn't get destroyed all game, along with Oher.  Cam doesn't play as bad.  Remmers was putrid Super Bowl Sunday.  Sadly, that will happen again the first game of the season as well, if he's starting.   

Why? Because once a guy has one bad game, he can never have another good one?

Funny. in over 40 years of watching football, I've never found that principle to be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Why? Because once a guy has one bad game, he can never have another good one?

Funny. in over 40 years of watching football, I've never found that principle to be true.

I have zero interest in seeing him vs Von Miller again.  This is going to be bad.  Michael Jackson bad.  I hope they give Daryl Williams a shot.  We've seen what Remmers does vs fast pass rushers.  We don't need to see Super Bowl Sunday again Opening night.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...