Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Flukes, Illusions and Mistakes


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Yesterdays game saw its fair share of each.

FLUKES

Things that we saw yesterday that I can't put all that much stock into...

The DeAngelo Williams Fumble: It hardly ever happens, but yesterday it did, and at a really bad time. That play cost us a chance to get the game close, and from there it was a struggle, but largely a futile one. With that said, DeAngelo pretty much never fumbles, and I don't expect that to change.

The Blocked Jason Baker Punt: Baker has made mistakes in two straught games. last week it was a low liner that facilitated a runback (block in the back helped too). This week it was taking forever to get a punt off. Weird, and bad, but I don't see that happening again anytime soon.

The Final Interception: Delhomme played decent for most of the game, but picked a really bad time to turn it over. With that said, I'd trust Steve Smith to go get the majority of those passes. Sadly, not this one.

The Louis Leonard Injury: You're kidding me, right? On an end of the game play that was largely already lost, a guy who was already a replacement for another guy lost at a thin position gets hurt? Wow. People may just start believing that whole "black cat" thing.

ILLUSIONS

Things that are not quite as they might appear...

Jake Delhomme's Performance (and the Falcon Defense): Delhomme being one of the nicest guys you'd ever find, I'm happy that he bounced back to have a good game yesterday. But while I'd love to sign on to the notion that he's "back", I find myself not ready to buy in. Why? because I don't believe the Falcon defense is really that good. They generated only minimal pressure yesterday. You could credit the O-Line, and that's fair, but deep down I just don't think the Falcon defense is all that good. Time will tell if it's true.

The Tony Gonzales Mystique: The saying goes in the NBA that 'the stars get the calls". And in at least one game in the NFL yesterday, that saying was true. Gonzales is good, make no mistake, but he got away with some pushes and shoved yesterday that would make Michael Irvin proud. I can't recall Gonzales doing this so much in the past, but this could be attributable to two things. Either A) I just haven't watched him closely enough or B) He's just having to resort to this sort of tactic now because he's getting older. Either way, he wouldn't have come off as good as the announcers said had some of those calls been made.

The Officiating: Speaking of which, to define the officiating yesterday as largely "hands off" would have been an understatement. I saw blatant holding on both sides of the ball go uncalled. I'll call that a wash, but the calls on offensive and defensive interference? Not so much. Marshall was guilty of his major foul for sure, but there were some really questionable no-calls on the other side. And of course, there's the Gonzales issue above. If I were Fox, I'd be sending some tape to the league this week.

The Eagles Defense: Something of a side note. Last week, Sean McDermoot looked like a new young defensive god. I said if he tried that ultra-aggressive approach against someone who knew how to deal with it, we'd see a different result. Looking at the highlights of yesterday's Eagles-Saints game, that appears to be what happened.

MISTAKES

The factors I saw yesterday which really bothered me...

Clock Management: As time was winding down, I thought the Panthers coaching staff did a poor job of managing the clock. Had they called a time out prior to the two minute warning, I believe we'd have had a little more time at the end. With that opportunity gone, they still could have called another one at a better time during the final drive. Overall, just not good.

Julius Peppers: He apparently does still play for us, but not much was seen of him or from him yesterday. To be certain, I believed - and still believe - that franchising him was the right thing to do this offseason. To let him go for nothing would have been ridiculous. What I disagree with is the decision to franchise him for the purpose of keeping him. When peppers finally signed his tender, my hope was that the Panthers would beon the phone with New England trying to acquire Richard Seymour or some other compensation. No such luck. And just to sum up yesterday, I considered posting this item under "Illusions" because that's what I felt his on-field time yesterday was, for the most part.

Not Paying For A Long Snapper: Jason Baker wasn't solely responsible for the punt block yesterday. While the snap did indeed get to him, it wasn't exactly perfect. New guy J Jonah Jameson Jansen had a couple of miscues in preseason. And while this was a relatively minor one, I feel we've got more to come on that front. Truthfully, we have other special teams issues as well, but that's part of an ongoing issue.

Continued Reliance on Blocking Tight Ends: I've said many a time that this team needs a hybrid tight end, and yesterday it would have been really nice to have. Jeff King's failure to secure a catch the way Gonzales did and the resulting outcomes of the respective challenges provided a perfect contrast. The Falcons showed how much of a weapon a good TE can be. Just wish John Fox would buy into that notion (and I find myself wondering if Jeff Davidson feels the same way).

Defensive Approach (And Execution): While the offense wasn't ideal yesterday, it still could have been enough. Unfortunately, the defense just couldn't stop the Falcons passing attack. One of my longstanding complaints with Fox is that I all too often see an unbalanced defense. With yesterdaym they did okay stopping the run at points, but outside of the one pickoff the pass defense looked awful. No pressure, and receivers with plenty of room to run. You might get away with one or the other of those, but never both.

Bottom Line For Me: I'm hoping that the defensive problems are part of a learning curve and that things will get better as the season goes on. I have no real evidence to suggest this, but it's a hope. As to the QB situation, I still feel we're only prolonging the inevitable. It seems clear though that if the inevitable hits, Fox will turn to A J Feeley rather than trying to get the possible future started with Matt Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone notice that they were running right at D.lewis..
turner ran towards the RDT 7 times. that was also where ryan made his successful QB sneak. i don't know if lewis was there on all of that but it sure isn't something you want.

when they ran up the middle the defense was much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

turner ran towards the RDT 7 times. that was also where ryan made his successful QB sneak. i don't know if lewis was there on all of that but it sure isn't something you want.

when they ran up the middle the defense was much better.

I agree, however we did seem to have some trouble filling the gaps and wrapping up to make the tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good write up. A few reactions from me related to your points.

The Blocked Punt

I was at the game, and correct me if I am wrong, but Atlanta didn't have anyone back there to field the punt given the field position. Once I saw that, I knew it was going to be blocked before the ball was even snapped. When you see that no one is back to field a punt, you call timeout.

Clock Management

I counted at least five times when the game clock ran down multiple seconds past the time when the referee blew the whistle and/or when we called a timeout. I'll have to go back and watch it on DVR, but that last possession of the first half - from inside the dome it looked like there should have been seven seconds on the game clock, not two.

The Officiating

Lots of holding on the Falcons second TD drive. Other than that, it seemed like a pretty clean game. But it's a lot harder to see these things without the benefit of TV replay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Blocked Punt

I was at the game, and correct me if I am wrong, but Atlanta didn't have anyone back there to field the punt given the field position. Once I saw that, I knew it was going to be blocked before the ball was even snapped. When you see that no one is back to field a punt, you call timeout.

that would have been the smart thing to do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great job, Mr. Scot. I too have thoughts about these points:

Good write up. A few reactions from me related to your points.

The Blocked Punt

I was at the game, and correct me if I am wrong, but Atlanta didn't have anyone back there to field the punt given the field position. Once I saw that, I knew it was going to be blocked before the ball was even snapped. When you see that no one is back to field a punt, you call timeout.

I don't think that Baker or JJ knew that the return man had run off the field and that they were facing 11 at the line. The TV camera angle was so bad that I didn't even see the guy run off the field. Someone at the line should've yelled at them to watch for the block or, better yet, called time out.

Clock Management

I counted at least five times when the game clock ran down multiple seconds passed the time when the referee blew the whistle and/or when we called a timeout. I'll have to go back and watch it on DVR, but that last possession of the first half - from inside the dome it looked like there should have been seven seconds on the game clock, not two.

I thought the refs did one horrific job of watching the clock. That Atlanta timekeeper was sneaking the time forward every chance they could to get time off the clock. Almost as bad as them spotting the ball for Atlanta .... errrrr.

The Officiating

Lots of holding on the Falcons second TD drive. Other than that, it seemed like a pretty clean game. But it's a lot harder to see these things without the benefit of TV replay.

There were too many non-calls. They looked as confused as our defense. Blatent holding, Jake is hit a few times after he threw the ball, Gonzo throwing around our db's, etc. Then they hold up the end of the game .........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that Baker or JJ knew that the return man had run off the field and that they were facing 11 at the line. The TV camera angle was so bad that I didn't even see the guy run off the field. Someone at the line should've yelled at them to watch for the block or, better yet, called time out.

I didn't see anyone run off the field either...I don't think there ever was anyone back there. It's not up to JJ or Baker to see that. It's up to Fox and Crossman to see that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Officiating: Speaking of which, to define the officiating yesterday as largely "hands off" would have been an understatement. I saw blatant holding on both sides of the ball go uncalled. I'll call that a wash, but the calls on offensive and defensive interference? Not so much. Marshall was guilty of his major foul for sure, but there were some really questionable no-calls on the other side. And of course, there's the Gonzales issue above. If I were Fox, I'd be sending some tape to the league this week.

Some of the spots were VERY generous.

I remember a scoring drive where they tried to convert a third down and ran it between the tackles and the ball was spotted nearly a full yard, maybe more, in front of where Turner was able to get it.

I remember thinking what the hell they were measuring for after the play and then realized the terrible spot.

Then, the ensuing play they ran a QB sneak to try and convert a 4th down, and I celebrated because, from what I saw Ryan clearly did not get it. Again the spot seemed way off, though not as off as the previous play, but still enough to convert and get the first down.

They scored their last TD on this drive if I remember correctly.

Maybe the bad officiating was the reason our players kept knocking over the officials. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see anyone run off the field either...I don't think there ever was anyone back there. It's not up to JJ or Baker to see that. It's up to Fox and Crossman to see that.

I was gonna say this too... another mistake to chalk up to the coaches... the punter ought not have to worry about who's on the field, that's the ST coach's job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO this team is poorly set up for the cover 2 but thats what we got. As much as I want this team to be good I dont think we will see much better performance out of them. We have a whole pool of really good LBs but yet we dont even use them for pressure and thats gonna be our downfall cause our Dline just stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FitSpresso Reviews: A Comprehensive Examination of Ingredients, Safety, and Customer Experiences  last updated 21 sec ago FitSpresso, a dietary supplement marketed as a revolutionary weight loss aid, has garnered significant attention across the United States (US), United Kingdom (UK), Canada (CA), and Australia (AU). Promising benefits such as enhanced fat burning, improved metabolism, and increased energy levels, FitSpresso is purportedly based on natural ingredients. However, a thorough review of its ingredients, safety, efficacy, and customer feedback is essential to determine whether FitSpresso lives up to its claims or if it raises significant red flags. What is FitSpresso? FitSpresso is a weight loss supplement that blends various natural ingredients to purportedly support weight management. Marketed with terms like "coffee loophole" and "Mediterranean ritual," it aims to attract consumers looking for natural and effective ways to lose weight. The supplement is designed to be taken in capsule form, making it convenient for daily use. 💯GET YOUR FitSpresso 75% DISCOUNT NOW 👉 💯Click here to Learn More Fitspresso Coffee 👉 Ingredients of FitSpresso The effectiveness of any supplement largely depends on its ingredients. FitSpresso claims to use a blend of scientifically backed natural components. Here are the primary ingredients and their purported benefits: Chlorogenic Acid (CGA): Extracted from green coffee beans, CGA is believed to influence how the body handles blood sugar and metabolism, potentially aiding in weight loss and reducing fat accumulation. L-Carnitine: This amino acid plays a crucial role in energy production by transporting fatty acids into the mitochondria, where they are burned for energy. It is often included in weight loss supplements to enhance fat burning. Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG): A potent antioxidant found in green tea, EGCG is known for its fat-burning properties and ability to boost metabolic rate. It also offers cardiovascular benefits. Chromium: An essential trace mineral, chromium helps regulate blood sugar levels and may reduce cravings, which can be beneficial for weight management. L-Theanine: Found in tea leaves, L-theanine is known for its calming effects without causing drowsiness. It can help reduce stress and improve focus, which might indirectly support weight loss efforts. Berberine: A bioactive compound extracted from various plants, berberine has been shown to improve metabolic function, regulate blood sugar levels, and support weight loss. Resveratrol: An antioxidant found in red wine and certain berries, resveratrol is known for its potential to protect against cardiovascular diseases and support weight loss by improving metabolic health. 💯GET YOUR FitSpresso 75% DISCOUNT NOW 👉 💯Click here to Learn More Fitspresso Coffee 👉 Availability in the UK, CA, and AU FitSpresso is marketed and available for purchase in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia. The supplement can be ordered directly from the official FitSpresso website, which ensures that customers receive genuine products. Availability through other online retailers or physical stores might vary, and consumers should be cautious of counterfeit products. Safety and Legitimacy Is FitSpresso Safe to Use? FitSpresso is generally considered safe for most individuals due to its use of natural ingredients. However, the safety of any supplement can depend on individual health conditions and sensitivities. Consulting a healthcare provider before starting any new supplement is crucial, especially for individuals with pre-existing medical conditions or those taking other medications. Is FitSpresso Safe and Legit? The legitimacy of FitSpresso has been questioned due to concerns about its marketing practices and the authenticity of customer reviews. While the ingredients are known for their health benefits, the lack of transparent clinical validation and potential misleading marketing tactics suggest that consumers should approach with caution. It is advisable to seek medical advice and conduct thorough research before trying FitSpresso. Is FitSpresso FDA Approved? No, FitSpresso is not FDA approved. The FDA does not approve dietary supplements before they reach the market. However, the FDA can take action against unsafe or misbranded supplements. The absence of FDA approval means that FitSpresso’s safety and efficacy have not been confirmed by a regulatory authority. Is FitSpresso Gluten-Free? The official product information does not specify whether FitSpresso is gluten-free. Individuals with gluten sensitivities or celiac disease should contact the manufacturer directly to verify this information before using the product. Side Effects of FitSpresso While FitSpresso is generally considered safe due to its natural ingredients, some users may experience side effects, including: Jitteriness or Anxiety: Due to caffeine content from green coffee beans. Digestive Issues: Such as nausea, bloating, or diarrhea, especially in individuals sensitive to certain ingredients. Sleep Disturbances: If taken late in the day, the caffeine content may interfere with sleep. Individual reactions can vary, and it is essential to monitor any adverse effects when starting the supplement. Usage and Expected Results How to Use FitSpresso FitSpresso is typically taken in capsule form. The recommended dosage is usually two capsules per day. For optimal results, it is suggested to take one capsule in the morning with breakfast and another in the afternoon. Consistency in taking the supplement, combined with a balanced diet and regular exercise, can enhance its effectiveness. How Long Does It Take to See Results on FitSpresso? The time frame to see results from FitSpresso can vary among individuals. Some users may notice changes within a few weeks, while others might require a couple of months. Consistency in usage and incorporating healthy lifestyle practices are key to achieving the best results. Cost of FitSpresso The cost of FitSpresso can vary depending on the purchasing options available on the official website. Discounts and bulk purchase deals are often available, which can reduce the overall cost. It is advisable to check the official website for the most current pricing information and any special offers. Customer Reviews and Experiences Positive Reviews Some users report positive experiences with FitSpresso, noting significant weight loss and increased energy levels. Testimonials on the official website and other platforms often highlight these benefits. For instance, one user claimed to have lost 34 pounds after using FitSpresso consistently, while others have expressed satisfaction with their improved physical condition and stamina. Negative Reviews and Concerns However, there are also numerous negative reviews and concerns about FitSpresso. Common issues include: Misleading Marketing: Allegations of false claims, such as fake celebrity endorsements and unfounded assertions of FDA approval. Doubtful Customer Testimonials: Some reviews and testimonials are suspected to be fabricated, using stock photos or actors. Refund Issues: Complaints about difficulties in obtaining refunds despite the product’s money-back guarantee. Ineffectiveness: Reports from users who did not experience the promised benefits, raising questions about the supplement’s efficacy. Given the mixed reviews and significant concerns, potential customers should exercise caution and seek professional medical advice before trying FitSpresso. Weight Loss and Coffee Which Type of Coffee is Best for Weight Loss? For those looking to incorporate coffee into their weight loss regimen, black coffee is often considered the best option due to its low calorie content and natural ability to boost metabolism. Avoiding added sugars and creamers can help maximize the benefits. Adding ingredients like cinnamon, which may help regulate blood sugar levels, or a splash of almond milk for flavor can enhance the drink without significantly increasing calorie intake. What Can You Add to Coffee for Weight Loss? Cinnamon: Known for its potential to regulate blood sugar and add flavor without calories. MCT Oil: Provides healthy fats that can boost energy and promote satiety. Lemon Juice: Can aid digestion and provide a fresh flavor. Protein Powder: Adds protein to help with muscle maintenance and hunger control. 💯GET YOUR FitSpresso 75% DISCOUNT NOW 👉 💯Click here to Learn More Fitspresso Coffee 👉 Specific Supplements and Their Benefits Is Berberine Good for Weight Loss? Berberine is a compound that has shown potential benefits for weight loss. It can improve metabolic function, help regulate blood sugar levels, and reduce insulin resistance, all of which can support weight management. What is the Best Weight Loss Pill? The effectiveness of weight loss pills can vary widely. Some well-regarded options include: Orlistat (Alli): FDA-approved for weight loss by reducing fat absorption. Phentermine: A prescription medication that suppresses appetite. Green Tea Extract: Known for its antioxidant properties and potential to increase fat burning. Consulting with a healthcare provider is essential to determine the most suitable and safe weight loss supplement for your needs. Conclusion FitSpresso presents a blend of natural ingredients that promise various health benefits, particularly in weight management. However, the mixed customer reviews, concerns about marketing practices, and lack of transparent clinical validation suggest that potential users should approach with caution. Consulting healthcare professionals, conducting thorough research, and considering individual health conditions are vital steps before integrating FitSpresso or any new supplement into your routine. As with any dietary supplement, the key to success lies in combining it with a balanced diet, regular exercise, and a healthy lifestyle.   💯GET YOUR FitSpresso 75% DISCOUNT NOW 👉 💯Click here to Learn More Fitspresso Coffee 👉
    • I've been using Java Burn for a few weeks now, and I must say, it's impressive! Not only has it seamlessly integrated into my morning coffee routine, but I've also noticed a significant boost in my energy levels and a reduction in my cravings for unhealthy snacks. It's great to find a weight loss supplement that's natural, tasteless, and doesn't disrupt my daily life. Highly recommend it for anyone looking to shed some pounds effortlessly!     💯GET YOUR Java Burn 75% DISCOUNT NOW 👉 💯Click here to Learn More Java Burn Coffee 👉
    • I would bet dollars to donuts even if Young works out in 2024 we still draft a qb to have on the roster and develop.  Dalton will not be here in 2025, bryce will be in his 3rd year so he shouldnt need a vet presence.  I can almost promise at some point that swing on a guy
×
×
  • Create New...