Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marlowe is doubtful, Klein and Vern are questionable for tomm game


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Look for Marcus Ball to be activated from the practice squad.

If we do that doesn't he have to sign for at least a few games? I know he is making the trip but that decision is longer than just this game right? Or do I have that all wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

If we do that doesn't he have to sign for at least a few games? I know he is making the trip but that decision is longer than just this game right? Or do I have that all wrong?

Incorrect. We sign him off the PS but have to cut one player form our 53 (prob Jared Norris) to do so. We can then cut Ball after the game if we choose to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Incorrect. We sign him off the PS but have to cut one player form our 53 (prob Jared Norris) to do so. We can then cut Ball after the game if we choose to.

Am I thinking of when we sign someone off of another team's Practice Squad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Good posting. Questionable now just means "we don't know" if the player will play. I think we see more doubtfuls showing up on injury reports where a player is unlikely. Questionable was kind of 50-50 before, but I think questionable is now anything from there's a chance the player won't play all the way to he might play. Doubtful is now the new good chance they won't play. If the player is pretty much playing, they aren't going to be on the report at all, not probable.

I disagree, IMO probable guys I think will simply become questionable guys under the new format. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, stbugs said:

I think some may, but given that 95% of probables ended up playing, I thought the goal was to remove the people who everyone knew was playing from the injury report. That said, you could be right that now everyone is just questionable unless they are unlikely to play. I hope that isn't the case because then there's really no point to it at all. Could be based upon teams, like the Patriots.

No, questionable is still the same except probable is grouped into it. If the person has a 50% chance or better or playing, then they are questionable now. Basically, questionable is now just more confusing and less helpful. Thank god the NFL clarified injuries! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Moorgan said:

Am I thinking of when we sign someone off of another team's Practice Squad?

There's no requirement for keeping someone from the PS, as far as them physically being on the active roster.  You can sign someone from your own squad, or another team's squad, and cut them the next day.  Payment may be what you're thinking about.  Once signed from the PS, you have to pay them league minimum salary for a certain amount of weeks.  I'm thinking 3 or 4 weeks, but can't recall exactly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...