Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More gnashing in New Orleans


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

A Number of things I'd like to note as it revolves around yesterday's loss.



1) When Delvin Breaux got hurt his immediate replacement was an UDFA Rookie. Let that sink in. As recently as 2014 we spent a 2nd rounder on a CB(3rd/5th in 2015) and signed at least 3 to contracts yet were still down to UDFA's as immediate replacements.

2) Jairus Byrd = 10mil Cap Hit
Cam Jordan = 5mil Cap Hit
$15 Million Dollars = 5 Tckls and 0 impact plays between them.

3) CJ Spiller = 4mil Cap HIt = inactive because of a #'s game. Returning Kickoffs is something he's excelled at throughout his career and yet we collectively hold our breaths as Murphy receives a kick or punt for the 2nd year in a row.

4) We used the 13th draft pick on a starting LG. Carl Nicks was a 5th rounder

5) Our 31st pick from a year ago Stephone Anthony played less snaps than a waiver wire request in 2015 in Michael Mauti.

6) We used a 2nd round pick on a passrusher with 2 ACL injuries who is out with a 3rd ACL injuryscratch.gif.

7) We have $35 million in dead money. Only 1 of those players is currently on the team. Jahri Evans. That equates to 8 different players we no longer have on the team that could have been of use in Sunday's game.

8) John Jenkins all 6'3 350 lbs of him got single blocked by a Center on top of picking the wrong gap that lead to a 70yd TD. A man that's 350lbs who we drafted using a 3rd round pick to be a NT to tie up 2 blockers got single blocked 3 yds off the ball. Let that sink in.

9) Since 2006 we've used 7 draft picks on WR's. Of those 7 only 2 were high draft picks Cooks/Meachem. The rest were lower round picks and yet we've been a top 5-10 passing offense for much of the decade. In that same span we've used 3 draft picks on RB's. Two 1st' and a 4th. 1 of them was a satellite back and the other Ingram. During this 10 year span we haven't had a single 1000 yard rusher and every year we look to improve the running game. Does it not seem like the RB position may be harder to hit on than WR for us and more important thus the need to be looking at RB talent much closer? I mean we kept 6 RB's for christ sakes..........utterly no reason for that.

10) We have 6 RBs on the roster meanwhile only 5 DBs but we are a passing teamscratch.gifdunno.gif

11) Wonder if players that would have been taken with the 1st and 2nd rounder from the Bounty debacle would have helped?

12) Since 2012 alone we've made a ton of FA acquisitions/Drafts/ Player transactions. Curtis Lofton, David Hawthorne, Will Herring, Erik Lorig, Corey White, Akiem Hicks, Champ Bailey, Brandon Browner, Jairus Byrd, CJ Spiller, Ben Grubbs, Brodrick Bunkley, Chris Chamberlain, Barrett Rudd, Nick Toon, Andrew Tiller (Still in league) Marcel Jones, Tyrunn Walker, Keenan Lewis, Benjamin Watson, Victor Butler, Rufus Johnson, Kenny Stills, Rafael Bush, Stanley Jean Baptiste, Khari Fortt, Ronald Powell, Tavon Rooks, Vinnie Sunseri, Dannel Ellerbe, Davis Tull, Stephone Anthony, Damian Swann.

I'm not going to even add these guys up but these players are either no longer on the team, under performing, or partaking in roles that don't fit justify their draft position. That's a lot of high profile misses in a 3-4 year span. Bad FA signings, bad resignings, bad draft picks, bad cuts...you name it....its all been bad.




So while we sit here and debate over whether it was the missed field goal, the int, the injury to Breaux, or the refs that cost us Sunday's game the truth is our problems started way before the clock started from 15:00 in the 1st Q of Sundays game.  

 

read the comments here...  http://saintsreport.com/forums/f2/chickens-coming-home-roost-358782/  

Reminds me so much of the Hurney era except for his 1st rd. picks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those guys get all in a tizzy because they expect too much. If you expect a 7-9 season, you're not shocked when you get a 7-9 season. 

The Breaux injury derailed a very promising start for the defense, but depth is one of the issues this team faces in becoming competetive again. The team is another solid offseason away from competing. I'm not sure what these guys expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

Those guys get all in a tizzy because they expect too much. If you expect a 7-9 season, you're not shocked when you get a 7-9 season. 

The Breaux injury derailed a very promising start for the defense, but depth is one of the issues this team faces in becoming competetive again. The team is another solid offseason away from competing. I'm not sure what these guys expect.

I try to tell every Saints fan they should want to lose, tank and get better Draft position.  Keeping Brees does nothing for your team.  Your defense will be poo for a while, and it has been for a while.

While Brees is good, he can't single handedly win you games when your defense is trash.  Thus, a 7-9 season is what the next two seasons should look like for your team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nctarheel0619 said:

I try to tell every Saints fan they should want to lose, tank and get better Draft position.  Keeping Brees does nothing for your team.  Your defense will be poo for a while, and it has been for a while.

While Brees is good, he can't single handedly win you games when your defense is trash.  Thus, a 7-9 season is what the next two seasons should look like for your team.  

I think that's a foolish notion as well. You can draft well, no matter where you're drafting. There's been major overhaul on defense the last couple years. If they can make any improvement over the next couple years, the Saints will be a competetive team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, saints4lifeagain said:

I think that's a foolish notion as well. You can draft well, no matter where you're drafting. There's been major overhaul on defense the last couple years. If they can make any improvement over the next couple years, the Saints will be a competetive team. 

I just don't see it happening.  Being competitive, and actually winning are two different things.  Drafting high could get you a QB for the foreseeable future after Brees.  And that's what all Saints fans should want, correct?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

I just don't see it happening.  Being competitive, and actually winning are two different things.  Drafting high could get you a QB for the foreseeable future after Brees.  And that's what all Saints fans should want, correct?  

Drafting high could get us a QB of the future. It could get us Alex Smith or Matt Ryan. You worry about life after a HOF QB after said QB leaves. If you have a chance to add a QB while he's still there, sure. But you don't get rid of a HOF QB because he's not letting you lose enough. That's absolutely absurd, to me. 

The Saints need to continue trying to work on the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cat said:

Fun read.  However the refs fuged them on Sunday. That game should have been over but the call on 4th down that put the Raiders at the goal to score the last TD was a complete screw job. 

The call was terrible. But giving up 22 points in the 4th quarter is why we lost. After the call, they still gave up a TD. All they had to do to get the W was stop the 2 point conversion. 

On top of that, poor clock management earlier in the half led to us having to try to get into field goal range with 40 seconds left and no time outs. They did a great job, but 1 more time out and we get another 10 yards for the kick and it's 51 instead of 61. 

Refs make mistakes. You shouldn't leave it in their hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...