Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Luke Kuechly passes Jon Beason


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

One thing I've noticed so far this year is Luke seems much more emotional out on the field.  I think this goes to his leadership.  I think he sees the need for it given that we don't have a presence like Josh Norman or Mike Mitchell in that role, and he has stepped up to fill it.  Kuechly is truly a special talent.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Seltzer said:

One thing I've noticed so far this year is Luke seems much more emotional out on the field.  I think this goes to his leadership.  I think he sees the need for it given that we don't have a presence like Josh Norman or Mike Mitchell in that role, and he has stepped up to fill it.  Kuechly is truly a special talent.

 

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Luke is the brain of the defense but those guys were the attitude everyone fed off of. I'd put Hardy in there as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Daddy_Uncle said:

are you saying Mike Mitchell and Josh Norman were better leaders than Luke? I'm confused. Also I've never seen Luke not fired up on the field. He talks poo all game long every game. I love it

Absolutely not.  Luke has always been a leader, just to me he seems more emotional on a consistent basis than he has in years past.  He has always talked poo, just think he is more in offensive guys faces more than he has in the past.  Regardless, I'm loving it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...