Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2 TE set


The_Rainmaker

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, The_Rainmaker said:

With injuries hitting the OL especially the wrong one will Shula and co. staff  use more 2TE set to help the OTs out and have more of ball control running game? Patriots have used it successfully this season can the Panthers adjust like them, time for more of Scotty Simonson.

Problem is none of our TEs can block. And none of them can catch outside of Olsen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thomas96 said:

Problem is none of our TEs can block. And none of them can catch outside of Olsen.

I believe Scott Simpson can just need chance with 1st string offense. If they cant yet they need to get  game time experience to grow as players and become better at blocking & catching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm always curious, when people ask for more two TE sets, as to how many more they want. We already stack the box on the offensive side more than any other team, I believe the average was 6.5 players per snap last season (not sure about this year). This is part of the reason our receivers aren't getting open, they're so outnumbered by DBs and LBs.

Olsen plays every snap, while Dickson and Simonson have combined for around 50% thus far, so we're running two TE sets roughly half the time. To be fair, that's actually down from last year when the second TE played 55% of the time. We even saw a few 3 TE looks vs. Denver.

We're running the sets, so what people are really clamoring for is the production we saw from the Olsen/Shockey duo. But we actually have been getting that level of production (995 yards, 9 TDs combined), it's just been from Olsen alone.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, jdpanther5 said:

I'm always curious, when people ask for more two TE sets, as to how many more they want. We already stack the box on the offensive side more than any other team, I believe the average was 6.5 players per snap last season (not sure about this year). This is part of the reason our receivers aren't getting open, they're so outnumbered by DBs and LBs.

Olsen plays every snap, while Dickson and Simonson have combined for around 50% thus far, so we're running two TE sets roughly half the time. To be fair, that's actually down from last year when the second TE played 55% of the time. We even saw a few 3 TE looks vs. Denver.

We're running the sets, so what people are really clamoring for is the production we saw from the Olsen/Shockey duo. But we actually have been getting that level of production (995 yards, 9 TDs combined), it's just been from Olsen alone.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

We don't have the production because we use 2 TE sets for different reasons with Shula vs Chud.  

TEs were viewed as weapons with Chud

Shula views them as aid for weak OTs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jdpanther5 said:

I'm always curious, when people ask for more two TE sets, as to how many more they want. We already stack the box on the offensive side more than any other team, I believe the average was 6.5 players per snap last season (not sure about this year). This is part of the reason our receivers aren't getting open, they're so outnumbered by DBs and LBs.

Olsen plays every snap, while Dickson and Simonson have combined for around 50% thus far, so we're running two TE sets roughly half the time. To be fair, that's actually down from last year when the second TE played 55% of the time. We even saw a few 3 TE looks vs. Denver.

We're running the sets, so what people are really clamoring for is the production we saw from the Olsen/Shockey duo. But we actually have been getting that level of production (995 yards, 9 TDs combined), it's just been from Olsen alone.

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Where going away from our identity which is being physical and controlling the tempo of the game with running game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...