Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This team is trash.

nctarheel0619

By nctarheel0619,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Let's be honest, minus last year (and even half of last year) this team has ALWAYS given up leads.   This goes past Rivera into Fox era.  Richardson hires "play not to lose" coaches and not "play to win" coaches and we just have to get used to it.  Sadly.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Meh, no real reason to have an opinion.  You see the product in the coaching staff and the players.  What you see, is what you get.  poo is poo.  Or poo.  As the Huddle calls it.  

 

Stopped reading at this. No real reason to continue with an obvious troll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Zaximus said:

Let's be honest, minus last year (and even half of last year) this team has ALWAYS given up leads.   This goes past Rivera into Fox era.  Richardson hires "play not to lose" coaches and not "play to win" coaches and we just have to get used to it.  Sadly.  

True....and he employs a fumble at the worst time receiver and inopportune interception throwing and sack taking qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted
Just now, csx said:

True....and he employs a fumble at the worst time receiver and inopportune interception throwing and sack taking qb.

The whole game was play not to lose.  Look at Shula's play calls.   Rivera needs to nip that in the bud but he obviously is cool with it.  We didn't even have a real punter or an experienced holder so playing for FG should have been out the door.  No urgency in this team when every game is a must-win at this point.  Gettleman didn't help obviously.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jfo89 Rising Star

jfo89

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, truthjuice said:

I still support the team, MVP QB included, win or lose. We made some stupid decisions but oh well. We can't go back and change it. This fanbase is such a flip flopper though. First half, everybody was excited and Cam was the best thing since sliced bread. By the end of the game , they were like Cam lost it for us and he's a  piss poor leader and we should drat Watson and have a QB competition and Cam should've taken the sack at 20 seconds you know bc KB fumbled. Ive even noticed when we win, it's something to bitch about. Very, very fickle. 

You're probably right about the fan base, but to be fair Cam did lose that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nctarheel0619 Newbie

nctarheel0619

Posted
  • Author
Posted
8 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

 

Thanks, I appreciate it. Now go troll someone else. Life is too short, and I have grown weary of you shtick.

Your* 

dont worry, the more we suck.  There will be worse ones then myself.  Enjoy it, man.  Nothing like going from the Super Bowl to this pile of poo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iamhubby1 Veteran

iamhubby1

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yep, I can't stand this place anymore and I only joined around draft time because someone mentioned it to me and it had a lot of great offseason info. This place is trash now.

 

I would not say it is trash quite yet. But if the trolls have their way, it will get to that point.

 

You can still get legitimate conversation around here. There are still plenty of folks that will debate you over legitimate issues. That will be able to disagree with you, and try and change your mind, not attack you for your stance.

 

But it is getting tougher and tougher the more we lose. I mean I get it. Nobody likes to lose. But man, does it have to mean this place has to deteriorate into Charlotte Observer Forum madness?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Question Contributor

The Question

Posted
Posted
Here's my prediction. With the influx of all these trolls. The Huddle will be a ghost town in short order. The only folks that will be left will be the trolls trolling themselves.

 

The Huddle, like the Panthers, are trending downwards quickly.



Huddles been kind of a ghost town since the super bowl tbh. Board used to be more active and better quality, at least that's the way it seems.


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      C Mc. Gotta love this guy!!

      By TD alt · Posted

      In my opinion Fitterer was probably right about not paying McCaffrey. Now not wanting to "pay RBs" in my opinion isn't something you want to set in stone, to me it all comes down to the individual.
    • TD alt
      Scourton isn't signed (& apparently it's a thing)

      By TD alt · Posted

      Maybe I'm just not understanding, but everywhere that I have read says that signing bonuses go against the cap prorated by as much as five years. The following example uses Andrew Luck's rookie contract as an example. "Take Andrew Luck, the first overall pick in the 2012 NFL draft. Luck signed a four-year contract with the Colts worth $22.1 million and included a $14.5 million signing bonus. Rather than a $14.5 million cap hit in 2012, the Colts spread out his signing bonus over the life of his contract. The hit against the cap would be $3.625 million per year over four years instead of a direct cap hit of $14.5 million directly in 2012. This gave the Colts more leverage and cap flexibility in signing other players." https://www.the33rdteam.com/nfl-signing-bonuses-explained/ I don't know why some of you think that signing bonuses aren't counted against the cap over the length of the contract, but whatever.   "The bonus with a signing is usually the most garish aspect of a rookie contract. Bonus is the immediate cash players receive when they ink a deal. It factors into the cap, but only for the whole contract duration, in terms of salary cap calculations. In the case of Bryce Young’s $24.6 million signing bonus, that’s prorated to approximately $6.15 million per season over a four-year deal. This format allows teams to handle the cap and provides rookies with some short-term fiscal stability, which is important given the high injury risk in this league." https://collegefootballnetwork.com/how-rookie-contracts-work-in-the-nfl/ I understand how signing bonuses can be a useful tool in order to manage the cap, and as one of the article suggests, signing bonuses may become important if you have a tight cap, but the bill is always going to come due. I'm not necessarily referring to you Tuka, but it seems to me that others simply don't want to understand that fact which is why they're reacting to what I'm saying negatively. How odd. In any event, I have a better general understanding of why signing bonuses are used now, and it's generally to fit salaries under the cap. Surely players, whether they be rookies or not, love a signing bonus because they get a good portion of their money up front. This in turn gives them more security and probably amounts to tax benefits as well. I also understand why teams would not want to use signing bonuses, particularly for players or draftees who have a higher probability of being gone before a contract even ends.
    • jfra78
      Are all veterinarians this greedy ?

      By jfra78 · Posted

      Get any shot you can at humane society, so much cheaper
×
×
  • Create New...