Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

was peppers trying to leave because of jake


speedy233

Recommended Posts

maybe little faith in the team?

maybe little faith in the coach?

maybe he just didn't want to be here anymore?

maybe he wanted some attention?

maybe he just wanted a change of scenery?

doesn't matter. he's here and getting $1mil/game and we got to deal with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, but they didn't predate Jakes choke in Seattle in the NFC champ game. Other than that 3 game start he had last year before getting hurt, he really hasn't been worth a crap since that game. I knew we were screwed in that game when they showed Delhomme on Fox before the game and he looked like a deer in headlights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, but they didn't predate Jakes choke in Seattle in the NFC champ game.

jake choked in that game?

i'm not a jake supporter...and not really a hater, but even i know that that game wasn't jake's fault...and it started with having a 4th string RB as your main ball carrier, then no receiving threat whatsoever outside of steve smith.

it's easy to lose a game when your only option is to throw the ball and hope someone on your team catches it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake's "choke" in the championship game in Seattle came after dominating performances on the road in New York and Chicago, and when our starting running back, who was our third string back, got knocked out early in the game. Only a hardcore hater would pin any blame on Jake for that game, much less judge the season by it.

Peppers issues don't have anything to do with Jake, that's just a stupid idea. You people need to go outside stop thinking about football for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...