Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Geep Chryst


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If San Diego fires their staff, Ken Whisenhunt would be available and he'd run an E-P (which I'd like to see)

The language used to describe the plays isn't going to change the look of an offense alone. Then there is the point that we are running it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, csx said:

The language used to describe the plays isn't going to change the look of an offense alone. Then there is the point that we are running it now.

What we're running now is still Coryell. 

Granted, Coryell and E-P are basically cousins.

Related Note: Voth speculated that Rivera would "place a call" to Norv Turner if Shula is fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

What we're running now is still Coryell. 

Granted, Coryell and E-P are basically cousins.

Related Note: Voth speculated that Rivera would "place a call" to Norv Turner if Shula is fired.

We are EP.    http://baltimoresportsandlife.com/erhardt-perkins-system-part-2/

According to anything I've found its EP. We changed when Shula took over. The simplification was a big topic.Shula played for Perkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, csx said:

We are EP.    http://baltimoresportsandlife.com/erhardt-perkins-system-part-2/

According to anything I've found its EP. We changed when Shula took over. The simplification was a big topic.Shula played for Perkins.

Citing Pro-Football Reference, which is not exactly a be-all, end-all source.

Mind you, our system has been adapted (all systems are), most specifically with the addition of the read-option stuff.

If we make no other adjustment besides removing that aspect entirely, I'd feel at least a little better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...