Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spider Man, Homecoming: First Trailer


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

I felt like the cheese was a little heavy in that installment. Molina definitely killed as Dr Oct but I couldn't get into it. That said, Spiderman 2 was 100x better than Spiderman 3...

This is true.  Spiderman 2 was good and Doc Oct is still the best Spider-Man villain we've seen on a movie.   I think 3 was so bad it ruined it forever for the others in my mind.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've come to the realization that superhero movies ultimately just don't work like they should in the standalone format.

For as good as Maguire and Molina may have been, they'll always lack the grounding a shared universe could have given them.

The MCU concept revolutionized comic book movies and made them what we always hoped they could be.

These days, I can't imagine it being any other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've come to the realization that superhero movies ultimately just don't work like they should in the standalone format.

For as good as Maguire and Molina may have been, they'll always lack the grounding a shared universe could have given them.

The MCU concept revolutionized comic book movies and made them what we always hoped they could be.

These days, I can't imagine it being any other way.

Very good point. To me, it's the exact opposite in the comics. I feel the best spidey moment, or most heroes for that matter, are standalone. Sometimes, it doesn't work out in the movies and the MCU understands that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

Why the fug can't superhero movies work like James Bond films? A series of stand alone films where the thespians are replaceable, and never requires a reboot?

That seems the most logical way to approach them.

 

 

inadverdently, they're doing it. I can't think of any comic character that was brought to the big screen that only one actor portrayed him....Besides Hugh Jackman and Wolverine. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

inadverdently, they're doing it. I can't think of any comic character that was brought to the big screen that only one actor portrayed him....Besides Hugh Jackman and Wolverine. 

A good portion of the MCU.

Iron Man - Downey

Thor - Hemsworth

Black Widow - Johansson

Loki - Hiddleston

Etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

A good portion of the MCU.

Iron Man - Downey

Thor - Hemsworth

Black Widow - Johansson

Loki - Hiddleston

Etc.

Downey is is synonymous with iron man I think they just won't have him in MCU over trying to replace him with someone else as Tony Stark.

but they could easily just bring another version of iron man in there don't think they will though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First of all the out was not caught because XL slipped and was the only person who could have caught that ball.  I'm not sure where you get that it was almost intercepted but go ahead and believe your story. The kick was in the direction we wanted the ball from the opening kickoff.  Do you think Fitzpatrick didn't try several kicks in that direction before the game and after half?  Do you think we just winged it.  Come on, OK so he missed one earlier.  Kickers can't adjust.  You make it sound like it was a wing and a pray. I saw the game.  Yes and we still got 21 yard from the running game.  We also got two first downs via that pass.  So it isn't like it was 100% we were going to run.   You have your blinders on and hate BY so much that you can't give him any credit because it defeats your narrative that he completely sucks.   What I have yet to here is you 100% for sure solution.  Which QB are you going to bring in that GUARANTEES that he'll be better than BY.  See the difference between you and me is I understand that he isn't the greatest QB to play the game.   But he has strengths and he continues to win whether you like it or not.  You and I have been on this forum for many years and agreed and disagreed on many topics.  I don't think I have ever seen you so filled with so much hatred for a player than BY.   I'm just going to leave it here to agree to disagree because you aren't going to change my outlook and I definitely am not going to change yours.  I do appreciate no personal attacks.  Someone said it earlier.  Ride with our game manager until a Mahomes falls into our laps. 
    • It's not the only issue. She said it was the "biggest" issue. lol 
    • The key difference being expectation. Jake was basically an afterthought of a free agent signing. Bryce is a guy we mortgaged the franchise on to be THE GUY. Not to mention a different era of football before all the rule changes to benefit the passing game. I don't care how we win either. I just realize that the odds of continuing to win in today's NFL with this level of QB play are very low. If I knew for sure that the Panthers had already decided to pursue other options at QB this off-season I could breathe a sigh of relief but of course they're not going to say that publicly.
×
×
  • Create New...