Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why The Hell Do We Keep Talking About "TE"?


FootballLivesMatter

Recommended Posts

Just now, top dawg said:

Gettleman is likely going to do what he always does, and take the BPA. Now what you must ask yourself is is there an OT worth drafting over a top-end TE. Moreover, I think that it is philosophically better to acquire a veteran OT in FA, as they will be decidedly better situated to make an impact than a rookie.

Cam Robinson comes with plenty of red flags on and off the field, I know. But, he has to be one of the the top guy on our board come draft day. 

 

If Gman went BPA, then he would've took Hunter Henry over Butler. He drafted Butler to replace KK. We will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

If Gman went BPA, then he would've took Hunter Henry over Butler.

How on earth do you know that? Were you in the draft room? Every report before and after the draft had Butler really high on Getlleman's board. BPA is best player in Gettleman's opinion, not best player in your or anyone else's opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

OT, SS, CB, RB >>>>>>> TE

even add a back up QB before a TE

Something is clearly wrong with you because you're not picking up what I'm laying down.  Go back and read the other posts and if you don't understand then I truly feel sorry for you.  

I think you're trolling at this point.  Have fun with that but leave me out of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FootballLivesMatter said:

OT, SS, CB, RB >>>>>>> TE

even add a back up QB before a TE

You don't necessarily get better by sticking to some imaginary mental map based on need. You must take the BPA into consideration. That's why outright acquiring solid talent in FA is so important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

You don't necessarily get better by sticking to some imaginary mental map based on need. You must take the BPA into consideration. That's why outright acquiring solid talent in FA is so important.

I don't see TE at this point for next year draft as BPA. 

CB and RB would be considered BPA. Check the projected players coming out for next season first before talking. It's loaded with CBs and RBs. Not much talents there at TE. Taking one in the 2nd or 3rd, I can see. Not one in the damn top 15. We could probably get OJ Howard who is he best TE currently with our 2nd round. That's saying a lot. TE is not BPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

We NEED another TE to compliment Olsen, not necessarily replace him. And of course since Olsen isn't immortal he's always one injury from ending up on IR, but let's not worry about that.

Good point! The injury bug is real! Without Olsen, we're as fuged as any team in the league that's missing its main receiver. 

When Gates went down this year, Hunter Henry more than rose to the occasion, and the Chargers didn't skip a beat as far as that is concerned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mojo said:

Something is clearly wrong with you because you're not picking up what I'm laying down.  Go back and read the other posts and if you don't understand then I truly feel sorry for you.  

I think you're trolling at this point.  Have fun with that but leave me out of it

Leave you out? You voluntarily threw yourself on here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...