WalterFootball with the "I don't know s h i t about the Panthers" pick of the week.

[nctarheel0619]

1. CLE - Myles Garrett, DE, Texas A&M
2. SF - DeShone Kizer, QB, Notre Dame
3. CHI - Jonathan Allen, DE, Alabama
4. JAX - Solomon Thomas, DE, Stanford
5. TEN - Jamal Adams, S, LSU
6. NYJ - Leonard Fournette, RB, LSU
7. LAC - Malik Hooker, S, Ohio State
8. CAR - Marlon Humphrey, CB, Alabama
9. CIN - Reuben Foster, LB, Alabama
10. BUF - Mitch Trubisky, QB, UNC
11. NO - Derek Barnett, DE, Tennessee
12. CLE - Marshon Lattimore, CB, Ohio State
13. AZ - Mike Williams, WR, Clemson
14. IND - Dalvin Cook, RB, Florida State
15. PHI - Quincy Wilson, CB, Florida
16. BAL - Cam Robinson, OT, Alabama
17. WAS - Chris Wormley, DE, Michigan
18. TEN - OJ Howard, TE, Alabama
19. TB - Corey Davis, WR, Western Michigan
20. DEN - Ryan Ramczyk, OT, Wisconsin

@15

[Bronn]

We'd take Foster in that scenario...

[nctarheel0619]

2 minutes ago, Bronn said:

We'd take Foster in that scenario...

Or Barnett.  

[jayflip]

His bff Charlie Campbell's was even worse. 

[PanthersGOATFan336]

Thanks for sharing but your threads are getting worse and worse...you offer no insight or thoughts on the matter. And you either just copy a article, link, or tweet. Stuff like this people can find on their own..I know you are limited in your thinking but you really junk up the place with these crappy threads

[nctarheel0619]

@PanthersGOATFan336

Forgot to tag you.  My fault.  I need my followers in my threads at all times.  

[top dawg]

Meh. Mocks are mocks. Largely a waste of time, and hardly worth a brouhaha.

Lance Zierlein at NFL.com mocked us Cam Robinson. Now you tell me what's OBVIOUSLY wrong with this picture:

Cam Robinson - OT, Alabama: Robinson at No. 8 would be way too early for my taste, but he has tremendous size and power as a run blocker, and the Panthers might feel they have to reach a bit to find help for Cam Newton.

[PanthersGOATFan336]

*sigh*

Poor Nctarhole...

His attempt at a comeback resembles something like this:

[nctarheel0619]

Define irony: stating how my thread sucks, but continuing to comment in it.  

[nctarheel0619]

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Meh. Mocks are mocks. Largely a waste of time, and hardly worth a brouhaha.

Lance Zierlein at NFL.com mocked us Cam Robinson. Now you tell me what's OBVIOUSLY wrong with this picture:

Cam Robinson - OT, Alabama: Robinson at No. 8 would be way too early for my taste, but he has tremendous size and power as a run blocker, and the Panthers might feel they have to reach a bit to find help for Cam Newton.

Yeah, but that position makes sense, because Robinson would be at a need (even though he isn't that good or worthy of the 8th pick).  Now a CB?  When we Drafted three last year?  That's just horrible dude.  

[Jangler]

mock drafts, mock talk, are all mocking you.

[top dawg]

4 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Yeah, but that position makes sense, because Robinson would be at a need (even though he isn't that good or worthy of the 8th pick).  Now a CB?  When we Drafted three last year?  That's just horrible dude.  

Not if he's deemed the BPA. You, yourself, have derided Worley as a bust of sorts, so another high quality CB should be welcome, right?

[nctarheel0619]

Just now, top dawg said:

Not if he's deemed the BPA. You, yourself, have derided Worley as a bust of sorts, so another high quality CB should be welcome, right?

Should be welcomed?  Maybe.  But, Drafting 3 CBs the prior year, I highly doubt another Rookie would make sense.  A Veteran at that position on the other hand?  Yes.  

[Bronn]

39 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

Or Barnett.  

If Foster and Barnett are both on the board, I gotta go with Foster. Luke's noggin' insurance and will allow us to boost our talent rotation on the outside.

A quality DE can be had with pick #40, IMHO. But I wouldn't be mad if we ended up picking Barnett at 8. In this situation, I just think Foster is the bigger talent.

Zach Cunningham is going to be a stud LB in the NFL too. In a nightmare scenario for us where all of our guys are gone at 8, and we couldn't trade down, I would even consider Cunningham at 8. It wouldn't be a nightmare in that Cunningham could do the same things Foster will, but because there is a bit of dropoff between the two, and Cunningham could probably be had in the 15-25 pick range.