Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ladders Now Count As Free Superbowl Tickets


Saca312

Recommended Posts

For those of you who spent great money and time planning and getting to the Superbowl, you may just want to reevaluate your life.

These teens got in the Superbowl for free. They didn't have any tickets on them or ID. They weren't even dressed fancy.

They just had themselves, some cameras, and a ladder.

So the next time you want to sneak in the Superbowl for free, bring a ladder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panther49er said:

So 5 seconds of the video shows the actual inside of the stadium from the seats and you can't see any of their faces during this time.. I call BS

Apparently legit. They may come out with a full video next:

http://thebull.cbslocal.com/2017/02/06/houston-youngsters-snuck-into-the-super-bowl-with-pics-and-video-to-prove-it/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Panther49er said:

So 5 seconds of the video shows the actual inside of the stadium from the seats and you can't see any of their faces during this time.. I call BS

Yeah, it looks more like they ran around outside of the stadium after the game started. No way they were inside with backpacks on.

Oh, and they saw Guy Fieri.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Yeah, it looks more like they ran around outside of the stadium after the game started. No way they were inside with backpacks on.

Oh, and they saw Guy Fieri.

Yep. I think it's a publicity stunt. Dude supposedly already had some famous YouTube channel so he probably had a pass which allowed them access behind the fence and film or do interviews. Just faked this to get even more followers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, thebigcat said:

That is kinda scary considering they got in with backpacks... People with bad intentions could have caused a national tragedy


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

shut up. You sound like such a typical old white person living well off that assumes the worst in everybody. Especially young, non white people. Probably a Trump supporter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Panther49er said:

Yep. I think it's a publicity stunt. Dude supposedly already had some famous YouTube channel so he probably had a pass which allowed them access behind the fence and film or do interviews. Just faked this to get even more followers.

Not to mention that they had actual cameras, but couldn't bring them into the stadium, yet had them afterwards. Did they hand them to someone who also snuck in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Not to mention that they had actual cameras, but couldn't bring them into the stadium, yet had them afterwards. Did they hand them to someone who also snuck in?

Well here's my thing. It's being reported on actual media outlets so I assume it's not fake.

They say they'll release a full video later. I assume they had to give the cameras up somewhere or put them up somewhere. I don't really know what.

It's confusing, but a heck loada media outlets would be outright fooled if this were fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol Actual media outlets... TMZ and a radio station?

Sorry, but Reddit has more of a clue."I have over a million YouTube hits" , which means absolutely nothing. If I were trying to prove that I had actually attended a major thing, I'd have video of me inside said thing.

"\While attending some sporting event called the 'Super Bowl', a major person called Beyonce (Or Madonna, I tend to not care), said " Damn, I would love some tiny white ding-dong all up in my hoo-hoo", , to which I replied, "I got this, child."

So, yeah.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Lol Actual media outlets... TMZ and a radio station?

Sorry, but Reddit has more of a clue."I have over a million YouTube hits" , which means absolutely nothing. If I were trying to prove that I had actually attended a major thing, I'd have video of me inside said thing.

"\While attending some sporting event called the 'Super Bowl', a major person called Beyonce (Or Madonna, I tend to not care), said " Damn, I would love some tiny white ding-dong all up in my hoo-hoo", , to which I replied, "I got this, child."

So, yeah.....

Lol fair.

Thought I remember seeing a CBS article on it. I did, but it was a local.

I did learn these guys have pranked people before, so this could honestly be a prank as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...