Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Ugly Makeovers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

A lot of 'used to be good" uglys have hit the open market in recent weeks with teams deciding their performance wasn't worth their salary anymore.  

A few years back, Michael Oher was one of those guys. And prior to his now apparently devastating concussion, it looked like the time back under his original position coach John Matsko had done him a lot of good.

So the question I have would be whether Oher was unique due to his relationship with Matsko or can Matsko perhaps pull off a similar stunt with Matt Kalil or someone else.

Can Matsko make one of these guys ugly again? And if so, who should it be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matsko is garbage. The Ravens OL as much better when he left. Our blocking schemes are garbage. Matt Kalil may not be garbage, seems to be effort issues with him, honestly having his brother here, there's no better fit from an accountability standpoint. That's what he needs, in my line of work from a management perspective I look at skill vs will. Kalil's issues are mostly will, if I were another team, I would not sign him due to this, but with Matt here I would sign him in a heartbeat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say Kalil.  He has the athletic ability to play LT at a high level, he just hasn't had the coaching.  Coming to Carolina with his bro, a great coach, and a team ready to made a SB run might be enough to push him to play his best.  This assuming he's back to form from his hip injury.

Okung - he's had as many health issues.

Fluker is Daryl Williams (as was stated by someone else in another).

After that....I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Matsko is garbage. The Ravens OL as much better when he left. Our blocking schemes are garbage. Matt Kalil may not be garbage, seems to be effort issues with him, honestly having his brother here, there's no better fit from an accountability standpoint. That's what he needs, in my line of work from a management perspective I look at skill vs will. Kalil's issues are mostly will, if I were another team, I would not sign him due to this, but with Matt here I would sign him in a heartbeat 

I'm not the world's biggest Matsko fan either, honestly.

But I'm looking for other's opinions on he and our potential new friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Man that "used to be good" feeling is a real b!tch.  When Jeremy proposed that "how many reps of 225 can you do" question, I got thinking...man I used to do a lot.  Now I get winded taking the elevator.

Is this your new alt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Man that "used to be good" feeling is a real b!tch.  When Jeremy proposed that "how many reps of 225 can you do" question, I got thinking...man I used to do a lot.  Now I get winded taking the elevator.

Insert Toby Keith song here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That new home page looking sexy and thicc
    • Serious question:  Why LG and not RG?  There may be something I do not know, but Hunt's contract is huge and he could be let go after this season (post june 1 cut) and it would save the Panthers a ton of money.  Extending him would be paying a G who is in his mid 30s guaranteed money (and I do not see that as a terrible thing).  So if we release him at age 31, we save $19m.  I like him, but at 31, will he be worth the mega contract?   LG Damien Lewis has actually outperformed Hunt and he is a year younger.  He would also save less vs. the cap and leave less in the dead cap pool.  While his current contract expires after the 2027 season, he is a better prospect (IMO) to extend because only 50% of his current contract was guaranteed.  Here are his contract numbers.   Now, getting to Ickey--he could want LT money if he is offered a second contract.  If we pay him LT money to play either G positions, we are likely overpaying.  Secondly, the injury he suffered could be one that limits his productivity.  Ickey was improving, but he was an average LT.  The only way I re-sign Ickey is to have him accept a G contract and make a lot of it incentive based.     I feel like I am missing something, but in my mind, Ickey was always a guard if you consider the fact that he is an average OT and would be a great G.  Is that still the case (injury)?
×
×
  • Create New...