Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Painkiller Article - NFL


stirs

Recommended Posts

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ok2h8pep said:

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 

Try pounding 8 beers after you take a few painkillers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ok2h8pep said:

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 

The pills might not have worked for you but they work for a lot of other people.

Now consider that the guys in the NFL might be in consistent pain all over their body for at LEAST 16 weeks out of the year (more likely at least half the year without any longer term injuries) and the pain pills work for them. So they get used to taking the pills every day in order to just be able to get up and function around the facilities. Then consider that over time the same amount of the drug doesn't work due to tolerance build up so they have to take more and more just to get the same relief they previously had. This is where mental and physical dependency kicks in. That's how they become addicted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 


Painkillers are misnamed IMO.

They do little in pain reduction, but they do a lot in increasing your "don't give a poo."

When I was prescribed opiates after a back injury, my back still hurt, but I didn't give a crap about the pain, or really anything undesirable. They even helped me find positives in my wife's crappy "good looking young adult vampire shows" that are generally God awful.

Hell I even thought I sounded like Eric Clapton Unplugged on the acoustic while I was on those meds. Good times.

...maybe I still have some hydros in the night sta............


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, ok2h8pep said:

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 

I think its just access. I, like most , have had narcotics prescribed a few times in life. I actually really like how they make me feel. I would take a little more than I should and a little more often than I should. If they were readily available and cheap or free, I would probably take them frequently - especially if I was banged up all of the time. Look at any player during any game; they are taped up left and right due to injury, not just support tape. They are never 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

The pills might not have worked for you but they work for a lot of other people.

Now consider that the guys in the NFL might be in consistent pain all over their body for at LEAST 16 weeks out of the year (more likely at least half the year without any longer term injuries) and the pain pills work for them. So they get used to taking the pills every day in order to just be able to get up and function around the facilities. Then consider that over time the same amount of the drug doesn't work due to tolerance build up so they have to take more and more just to get the same relief they previously had. This is where mental and physical dependency kicks in. That's how they become addicted. 

My cousin is ex-military and like many, has had to have multiple surgeries (shoulders and knees) from his service. His back and hip are screwed up too.  Like you describe, He is on all sorts of pain killers including morphine, just to get through the day. Though, I'm not a smoker, I have no doubt that marijuana would help his problems without destroying his organs like he is doing now. I feel the same way about the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ok2h8pep said:

I don't have an opinion on this but I do wonder how people get hooked on this stuff.  I've taken these same exact pills 3 or 4 at a time (in the past) and they didn't do a great job at alleviating my (back) pain and the narcotic effects were noticeable but hardly the same as pounding 8 beers in a couple of hours.  I'm not trying to be snarky but I have an honest curiosity about how someone goes from that first prescription to being absolutely dependent on these pills. 

good for you to never have experienced an addiction of any sort.  Thank your parents. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a disabled combat vet who is on pain management....

The way you get used to it is your brain literally opens up more "gates" to receive the drug....it literally alters your brain chemistry to take in more of the "happy" portion(part that gets you high). So if you take smaller dosages or get a tolerance that's how it leads to depression and stuff like that because all of your brain receptors aren't taking in the "happy".

Been on it for 6 years now...even had the cancer patch for awhile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also if they are taking those 5/500's a lot it's pretty stupid because the 500 mg of acetaminophen is really bad if you take a lot often....it's best to use the 5/325 or just straight 5's / 10's. That's what will kill your liver, especially combined with alcohol which we know the NFL athletes don't do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
    • 1st ⭐️ Big Bussi - 17 saves, .941 save % 2nd ⭐️ Logan Dankoven - 2 assists, 3 SOG, +3, 16:25 TOI 3rd ⭐️ Ghost Bear - 1 goal, 3 blocked shots, +2, 18:48 TOI
×
×
  • Create New...