Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Differences between this offseason and last


cam1uvrxoxo

Recommended Posts

Last offseason, to me, seemed really good. We went into the draft with no glaring weeknesses, until we cut Norman.  I would say that our roster had no true area of need at that time (remember that Oher wasn't hurt yet and we still had Norman) Obviously, last season turned out to be crap.

 

What can convince me that this season will be different? We're in a similar situation as a year ago, no glaring weakness going into the draft and hopefully taking BPA before going on another Super Bowl push.  What's different that will make this season a success??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, we did have holes. Remember Norman and the fact he was our only corner, and the rest are ancient off-the-couch mercenaries?

So we came into the draft to fix that need. Not an ideal situation at all for Gettleman.

This offseason, we've cleared off all our main holes with solid veterans/role players. We even replaced the loss of Ginn and Brown yesterday with CJ2 and Shepard.

We go into the draft for BPA. Likely finding a RB in this deep class, and double dipping at DE for our future. Getting a 2nd TE and SS is also likely.

As far as priorities to get, we're likely to get one stud DE and RB early, and a TE later in this deep draft. SS will probably be grabbed as well for potential, and we could probably work and try to acquire more draft picks.

Either way, the future of the franchise looks good. We're in prime position to nail and cement our status as a future dynasty at this rate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, cam1uvrxoxo said:

What can convince me that this season will be different? We're in a similar situation as a year ago, no glaring weakness going into the draft and hopefully taking BPA before going on another Super Bowl push.  What's different that will make this season a success??

This season will be better because our secondary will be more experienced and talented and our offensive line should be able to protect Cam better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, if our OL can stay healthy we should be better by default. Secondary gaining experience and Coleman being able to move back to FS should help a lot not to mention signing a real nickelback. Upgraded the DL by essentially swapping Ealy for Peppers. WR would have to be my biggest concern at the moment. I really hope we're not done there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last offseason I think we got too enamored with our own players and went after depth signings instead of getting guys to compete. For example, we did not bring in a SS to compete for the starting role with Tre Boston and gave him the role after releasing Roman Harper. We did not add a DE in the draft or FA we believed that Kony turned the corner with his Super Bowl performance and thought Rakim Cox, Horton, and Delaire would emerge after another year on the team. Also, how many times did Gettleman mention that we had an "extra first round" pick with Kelvin coming back from injury, so they thought they were set at WR and Philly Brown could take over Cotchery's role as slot WR. Next, Mike Remmers had a horrible performance in the SB but we did not bring in an OT to compete against him  but hoped that Daryl Williams would improve and take the job. Furthermore, we wanted to get a second TE to replace Ed Dickson but we did not land Jared Cook and settled for Beau Sandland and Scot Simonson to step up.

Honorable mentions 

Mike Tolbert was done a year prior but brought him back. Teddy Williams lead all special teams players in penalties, brought him back 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, cam1uvrxoxo said:

Rescinded the tag without notifying him!! Really fuged up

Norman's agent was clearly a clown. It was not Gettleman's responsibility to make sure the agent was doing his job. I seriously doubt the rescinding came out of left field and/or that at least the agent had no idea it was an option, and we're all speculating anyway since only Gettleman and the agent know the full story.

I'll accept that Gettleman put the team in a bad position, but not Norman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Norman's agent was clearly a clown. It was not Gettleman's responsibility to make sure the agent was doing his job. I seriously doubt the rescinding came out of left field and/or that at least the agent had no idea it was an option, and we're all speculating anyway since only Gettleman and the agent know the full story.

I'll accept that Gettleman put the team in a bad position, but not Norman.

Norman actually never signed the tag either 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, joeyxfresco said:

Norman actually never signed the tag either 

Exactly. They chose their negotiating tact and, due to whatever circumstances, failed - in an unprecedented manner - with respect to getting Carolina to meet their demands. 

Tough to say that Norman lost overall though... $75MM seemed to be what he was after all along.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was never onboard with Morgan to begin with.  The dude always seemed a hammer short of a full tool bag, maybe too many concussions.  He was a Fitterer hold over and I thought he should have been gone when Fitts went.  He literally made it to NFL GM with no credentials to speak of other than a playing career.  Shorts stints of personnel management for the Seahawks and Bills, neither organization choosing promotion or retention.  I believe Morgan was added as a friendly face to sooth the a fanbase that was growing to hate Tepper and probably retained for the same reason.  Morgan never coached, had minimal front office experience and the GM he "assisted" was deservedly fired.  From what I can find online he received a BA in Liberal Arts from Miami so that isn't exactly a qualification either.  
    • If you really want to change the identity of the culture, then your opinion may indeed be the way to go. 1) I see nothing from our drafts since 2020 to indicate that either the scouts or the GM's are shrew evaluators of college talent. 2) A new GM should be able to hire a coach since his livelihood is directly affected by how well the coach can get the team to perform on Sundays. The only time I'm ok with a GM keeping the coach that proceeded his hiring is if the new GM wants to work with the coach. Ideally, He should have final say over the coach instead of the owner. And, that coach and GM need to be in sync on how the team should be run on both sides of the ball. 3) A new coach should be able to pick his own staff. If he wants to keep a coach already on the staff that's fine. A new HC hire shouldn't be told that you have to use this guy for one of the jobs, especially a position as important OC or DC.
    • The crazy thing is some of these plays that went down to like 2 on the play clock were basic inside zone runs. That poo shouldn't take 30+ seconds to decide when you are down 24... It's not like they had to hot route multiple receivers and change blocking assignments after lining up. It's almost like Canales has somebody else's playbook and needs to flip through 10 pages to try and figure out what play he is going to run
×
×
  • Create New...