Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What would you trade to get Richard Sherman?


beastson

Recommended Posts

Things definitely aren't gloomy between Seattle and Sherman

 

IF we could afford him

 

Quote

He has $4.4 million of bonus money that would hit the cap, either in a pair of $2.2 million chunks or all at once. Also, $5 million of his base salary for 2017 became fully-guaranteed a year ago. A trade of the contract, which has a total base salary of $11.431 million for 2017, would absolve the Seahawks of that obligation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sherman is a great player, no doubt. But sometimes you take a player out of the scheme in which they have been successful and you are disappointed with what you get.

He would likely cost more than he would be worth to a team other than Seattle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Marguide said:

Sherman is a great player, no doubt. But sometimes you take a player out of the scheme in which they have been successful and you are disappointed with what you get.

He would likely cost more than he would be worth to a team other than Seattle.

 

I concur whole heartedly. But I would like to say that maybe we would have been players last year. After losing Josh, the kids could have used a solid vet to lean on. Just not the same this year.

 

This year. Our back 5, as a Unit, has the potential to be one of the best Units in the League. We need quality depth, that can push for playing time. Not a pricey Vet who will take away precious developmental time away from the kids.

 

If we are going to bring in a pricey Vet. I would much rather he be a DE, or even a WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not worth even saying because he's not coming here, I just have to say how much I love this.  A major asshole in a franchise and city so saturated with them, the chickens are finally coming home to roost as their soul is being ripped at its core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see them using Brooks in the passing game a good bit even early.  
    • If Brooks is fully healed,and they think he is, then we should be better.  We upgraded center and Hunt will be back.   At RB, Rico will turn 28 next month. Hubbard turns 27 next month.  Brooks turns 23 in July.  If Brooks pans out, he was a better college RB than either Rico or Chuba. He has not been taking a beating for 2 years--so if the knee holds, we could have something.   This is what it says about RB: Career Average: Running backs have the shortest average careers in the NFL, lasting just 2.57 years on average. The Peak: Most running backs reach their absolute peak performance around age 25 or 26, with nearly all peak seasons occurring before age 29. The "Age 28-29" Cliff: Statistical data shows a notable 15% to 25% drop in per-game fantasy and offensive production as backs transition from their age-28 to age-29 seasons. Very few running backs sustain elite production past age 30.
    • I’ll give him that. I love his belief in the trenches being where games are decided. Because that is also my belief.  And he is not fooling around he jumps all over a goal. Fix the OL. Well it cost but he fixed it.  And fixed it again this year while still getting pieces for the defense.  He has made a couple of mistakes but just keeps swinging after a miss until he gets something done. 
×
×
  • Create New...