Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I'm so glad we have 10,000 coaches in here who know the game more than Fox


hombredeass

Recommended Posts

so Jeff Fischer should be fired too? wow, you have really lost it now.

It depends on a fan's perspective. Ultimately every fan wants a championship, and those that say otherwise are lying. As for the Panthers, it's one thing to have teams that play up to their ability (or even beyond), with lots of heart and determination. Bill Cowher took a while to win, it's true, but for the most part all of his teams came prepared to play, and didn't make it a habit of letting games (particularly the ones that they were supposed to win) get away because of a lack of foucs, discipline, and uninspired and unimaginative coaching. After years of up and down seasons, where it can be argued that a lack of flexibility within an overal ultra-conservative ideology in football philosophy, there comes a time when you have to show a gradual progression in your overall master plan. OF course there are years that require rebuilding, and so the success of the team may have its ebb and flows, but it's hard to imagine that there should be an ebb and flow every other year. This is indicative of something missing, and it's the coaches job to fix whatever that is. It's not like Fox hasn't had the opportunity. Basically it's time to piss or get off the pot.

I am sure that many other fans of other teams, but more importantly students of the game, will tell you that. If you're happy with the status qou, then do nothing. If you aren't, then you must do something. To put it in it's most elementary sense: If you keep doing what you're doing, you're gonna keep getting what you're getting. Time to mix it up, and bring in some new ideas and perspectives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It depends on a fan's perspective. Ultimately every fan wants a championship, and those that say otherwise are lying. As for the Panthers, it's one thing to have teams that play up to their ability (or even beyond), with lots of heart and determination. Bill Cowher took a while to win, it's true, but for the most part all of his teams came prepared to play, and didn't make it a habit of letting games (particularly the ones that they were supposed to win) get away because of a lack of foucs, discipline, and uninspired and unimaginative coaching. After years of up and down seasons, where it can be argued that a lack of flexibility within an overal ultra-conservative ideology in football philosophy, there comes a time when you have to show a gradual progression in your overall master plan. OF course there are years that require rebuilding, and so the success of the team may have its ebb and flows, but it's hard to imagine that there should be an ebb and flow every other year. This is indicative of something missing, and it's the coaches job to fix whatever that is. It's not like Fox hasn't had the opportunity. Basically it's time to piss or get off the pot.

I am sure that many other fans of other teams, but more importantly students of the game, will tell you that. If you're happy with the status qou, then do nothing. If you aren't, then you must do something. To put it in it's most elementary sense: If you keep doing what you're doing, you're gonna keep getting what you're getting. Time to mix it up, and bring in some new ideas and perspectives.

Wow, that's like Fox on steroids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite as insulting as you are being, the way he's using it, yes it is.

it looks like a few writers are disagreeing with you GR(ammar)Watcher.

http://books.google.com/books?um=1&q=%22invalidates+nothing%22&lr=&sa=N&start=10

Now i need to take my new york ass (even though i'm really from Jersey lol. I guess you failed Geography in grade school too) into the kitchen and make myself a cup of CAWFEE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it looks like a few writers are disagreeing with you GR(ammar)Watcher.

http://books.google.com/books?um=1&q=%22invalidates+nothing%22&lr=&sa=N&start=10

Now i need to take my new york ass (even though i'm really from Jersey lol. I guess you failed Geography in grade school too) into the kitchen and make myself a cup of CAWFEE

Geez, sorry about the New Jersey/NYC mix up. Got worse, huh? :D Geography had nothing to do with it. It was more your syntax and occasional rudeness.

Some how while I was reading those short quotes, I got that "invalidates nothing" means changing nothing in the argument, which means that the argument remains valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol wut?  Stats dont matter now?  Got it
    • So.... you're admitting he's never going to be the type of QB who can drag his team to victories on a consistent basis? Because in today's NFL, the teams that are constant contenders have QB's who can put up those kind of games will their team to wins when needed. If Bryce was anything near as amazing last year as the Bryce defenders try to insinuate he was, we'd either have won more games or his stats would have been better, if not both. Yes, he showed significant improvement over the last 2 months of the season.  Yes, he had a few clutch  moments/throws/drives in that span too. BUT... It's also very much a true statement that on the whole, he was still AT BEST an average QB during that time period.   And for a QB who was touted as being a PG who can get wins without elite talent around him because of how he sees the game, that's just not good enough, sorry. And none of that is to say he can't do that this year, especially after we gave him a weapon like T-Mac and hopefully an improved XL and Coker.  But stop trying to say he was this amazing QB to end the year who has proven he can (and should) be considered a long term solution as a franchise QB, as it's just not true.
    • In what way is that remotely the same thing as I'm saying here? First things first, comparing QB's to any other position is just asinine to begin with.   Second, you're trying to imply the exact opposite of what I'm saying here, so it just doesn't make sense. I'm saying if you remove the players that teams haven't committed to as their long term QB solutions yet, Bryce is the last player ranked in this set of rankings, that's all.  But sure, go ahead and try to make some weird convoluted equivalent for my love of T-Mac (who btw, you'd probably only need to take away 12-15 WRs for me to rank T-Mac #1 in a dynasty format, just sayin, lol)
×
×
  • Create New...