Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

OJ Howard is a Huge Cam fan


PantherWake

Recommended Posts

Only reason I wouldn't like Howard is because of value and how he doesn't seem to have that high of a ceiling in comparison to other TEs we could grab.

Nevertheless, most complete TE from this class, so I guess it's justifiable. He's pretty basic from a skills standpoint, but I'm more or less accepting the fact that if Fournette, Thomas, and Adams don't fall, he's probably (sadly) our next option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Only reason I wouldn't like Howard is because of value and how he doesn't seem to have that high of a ceiling in comparison to other TEs we could grab.

Nevertheless, most complete TE from this class, so I guess it's justifiable. He's pretty basic from a skills standpoint, but I'm more or less accepting the fact that if Fournette, Thomas, and Adams don't fall, he's probably (sadly) our next option.

There's nothing special about Greg Olsen either but somehow he's always open and catches everything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

Really it's just me being scared OJ Howard doesn't live up to the hype. He has nothing to show on tape he'll be dominating in the league.

I hope I'm proven wrong if he's the pick.

Think of Alabama as Voltron.  OJ Howard was the Blazing Sword and they kept using those other useless weapons the entire time, when they could have just brought out the blazing sword and gone home. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Udogg said:

Think of Alabama as Voltron.  OJ Howard was the Blazing Sword and they kept using those other useless weapons the entire time, when they could have just brought out the blazing sword and gone home. 

Yep, so question is why didn't they use that blazing sword?

Is it an OJ Howard problem they tried to hide, or was it Bama themselves that is to blame? Most seem to want to say Bama, but I'm skeptical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Really it's just me being scared OJ Howard doesn't live up to the hype. He has nothing to show on tape he'll be dominating in the league.

I hope I'm proven wrong if he's the pick.

He is coming to the perfect system and the perfect veteran to develop under.

Bing bang botta boom!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...