Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Bengals And Panthers Competing For #2 Overall Pick. Panthers Have Current Lead & Offer.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mvp2014 said:

Sure would.  You're looking at the next Pep/Von type player and Pep is here to mentor him along with Mario and Charles.  Our front 4 would absolutely deserve a nickname if that happened 

Panthers  led the NFL in sacks, its all about being complimentary.  With DTs we have on Roster DE is less valuabe. 

Fournette is the BPA and would make this team elite. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thebigcat said:

Garret, KK, Star, Addison with Pep/CJ/Butler/Horton/Love rotating is the second best DL in the NFL behind the Texans


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

Panthers Front 7 > Houston Front 7 

You have to cover in this league , Panthers lead in sacks yet had average defense. 

Broncos pass rusher only started working at elite level after they shored up the secondary.

 

Fournette >  Garrett 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even if it wasn't for a runningback (which makes the idea of this trade up three times as bad), the thought that we are going to give up all this value for one player... this is something desperate franchises run by inept leaders do. this isn't something i'd imagine gettleman doing.

 

with the four picks we have in the first three rounds, we can easily fill this team with talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mvp2014 said:

Sure would.  You're looking at the next Pep/Von type player and Pep is here to mentor him along with Mario and Charles.  Our front 4 would absolutely deserve a nickname if that happened 

We dont have to trade the farm for 1 person..we made it too superbowl with that type of thinking and lost...we need bodies good bodies and with the picks we have we can get some decent ones for a change...If fornette gets hurt or garrett we will be back to where we were in life support mode..if we trade picks then we are still without good solid depth in key positions..just not a good idea to trade away picks we r not just a rb or De away from winning..we need more options

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Darvinsun said:

We dont have to trade the farm for 1 person..we made it too superbowl with that type of thinking and lost...we need bodies good bodies and with the picks we have we can get some decent ones for a change...If fornette gets hurt or garrett we will be back to where we were in life support mode..if we trade picks then we are still without good solid depth in key positions..just not a good idea to trade away picks we r not just a rb or De away from winning..we need more options

 

No we don't but if there was one dude worth it I think he's the guy.  Great draft to stack picks too so I'd be happy either way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Montsta said:

So everyone other than Fournette only have potential to be "adequate role players" at best?

Am I understanding your POV correctly?

only until the regular season when fournette has 400ish yards in 12 games and other guys that got taken after him in the top ten are in contention for roty

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep he made the comment " I dont know what they were doing out there at that point" in the press conference. Let's be real they all got paid but they also know his system suppresses there offensive potential.
    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...