Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rookie Camp...Rookie Jersey Numbers...


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

So as you all know rookie camp is upon us (insert it's happening gif) which is the first real step to getting back to football post NFL Draft. With that being said I've been curious what numbers our rookies will be wearing moving ahead...We all likely saw the introductory video for McCaffrey #22, but what about the rest?

Samuel - 10

Moton - 72

Hall - 74

All of these can be seen in their respective draft re-cap videos in the actual locker-room, but that still leaves Armah, and Butker, not to mention the UDFA's - So I know this isn't the biggest deal in the world, but something many are still interested in. 

Also the official site is still to be updated, even though the referenced players numbers are on their lockers.

http://www.panthers.com/team/roster.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Eric Crume is 72. So that won't be Moton's number

 

I'm aware, but if you watch his post draft video, where he takes his tour it shows his locker and it says #72. 

I don't think PS Squad Numbers (Crume) count vs the active roster, for what it's worth he also wore #72 in college. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Catufb85 said:

Weird #74 for Hall.  Usually an OL #.  Hope he brings production with that #

There was no more numbers in the 90's left for him. They're usually the first to get taken up during this time when rosters are most bloated. I know it's just a number, but seeing him at 74 would really annoy me for some reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, panther252 said:

There was no more numbers in the 90's left for him. They're usually the first to get taken up during this time when rosters are most bloated. I know it's just a number, but seeing him at 74 would really annoy me for some reason. 

I don't think I would hate it

I liked 76 for Hardy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think that depends more on how high our pick is. If we have the 1st, 2nd or even 3rd pick i think we are drafting a QB rather than shopping FA market for a QB1. Curious if we’d be reluctant to start a rookie QB week 1 though. 
    • Hurney 2.0 and Fitts were so bad I don't know if it was intentional or they were that abysmally clueless. Fittershits panicked repeatedly being on the back end of positional runs while Hurney couldn't evaluate anyone outside of the 1st.  I can't figure out why Plummer still has a jersey. There's no reason. Dalton brings nothing to the table. If another QB gets cut that has given a glimmer of anything better than what we have, we should look, and that goes for every position.  I cant get over how much different this team could have been with a competent GM and having accepted the Rams offer for Burns. This franchise could have gone in a totally different direction. 
    • I thought tanking wasn't actually a thing and we were firmly against it though?
×
×
  • Create New...