Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Donovan Mitchell


AppHeel

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Shocker said:

Michell has nice talent, a little undersized but nice talent.  For those thinking Malik Monk is dropping to 11 stop smoking crack, that ain't happening.  If he isn't top 5 I'm shocked.  

Fultz

Ball

Jackson

Taytum

Fox 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly buzzed after the distillery...

Draft overall--There are 8-12 guys that would be top-4/5 most other years with a top tier of 5 guys.  We better freaking have a hit this year.  

Fox or Monk could slip but I'm liking the chances at Mitchell. I think he could be a perfect addition.  

One random OT thing though--Something about Fox tells me he's the superstar of this class.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2017 at 10:31 PM, Shocker said:

Michell has nice talent, a little undersized but nice talent.  For those thinking Malik Monk is dropping to 11 stop smoking crack, that ain't happening.  If he isn't top 5 I'm shocked.  

What are you smoking man?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/13/2017 at 10:31 PM, Shocker said:

Michell has nice talent, a little undersized but nice talent.  For those thinking Malik Monk is dropping to 11 stop smoking crack, that ain't happening.  If he isn't top 5 I'm shocked.  

lolololololololololololol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's summer league. Things even out for most guys once the real deal starts. Frank Kaminsky is a prime example. He dominated summer league when he played his rookie year, but he had to adjust to the actual NBA game and he's really just now beginning to play well / perform consistently rather than flash every few games.

Not saying Mitchell and Kennard won't be good, but summer league isn't always the best indicator as to how good you will be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's summer league. Things even out for most guys once the real deal starts. Frank Kaminsky is a prime example. He dominated summer league when he played his rookie year, but he had to adjust to the actual NBA game and he's really just now beginning to play well / perform consistently rather than flash every few games.
Not saying Mitchell and Kennard won't be good, but summer league isn't always the best indicator as to how good you will be.


Frank hasn't been bad just inconsistent..
What you want from your rookies in summer league is for them to seperate themsleves ftom the pack and show flashes of the talent you drafted them for.. (like bacon did)
Both guys are doing that so the Jazz and Pistons should be happy so far about there picks..

Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...