Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Marty Hurney Interview


Johnny Rockets

Recommended Posts

Below is a link to an interview Hurney did just a bit ago on WFNZ. I have not had a chance to listen but I imagine it might be of some interest:

http://www.wfnz.com/media/audio-channel/marty-hurney-talks-new-role-interim-gm-garcia-and-bailey-show

 

One interview that I did listen to was with Alex Marvez from Sporting News and Panther pregame. I am not all that familiar with him but he has some strong opinions of the GMan/Huney move and for the most part, I agree with what he said. Worth a listen if you have time. The audio shows 40 mins but the interview is in the beginning and last about 12 mins. 

http://www.wfnz.com/media/audio-channel/mac-attack-alex-marvez-strong-take-panthers

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Snake said:

Can someone give a recap I'm at work. 

blah blah he's learned a lot since being released.  Learned to be more analytical and make business decisions from DG.   Acknowledges his past failures as being too emotional and friendly wiht players and their negotiations. 

 

Not interested in future opportunities with other teams.  Here for this organization and the people in it.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Johnny Rockets said:

Below is a link to an interview Hurney did just a bit ago on WFNZ. I have not had a chance to listen but I imagine it might be of some interest:

http://www.wfnz.com/media/audio-channel/marty-hurney-talks-new-role-interim-gm-garcia-and-bailey-show

 

One interview that I did listen to was with Alex Marvez from Sporting News and Panther pregame. I am not all that familiar with him but he has some strong opinions of the GMan/Huney move and for the most part, I agree with what he said. Worth a listen if you have time. The audio shows 40 mins but the interview is in the beginning and last about 12 mins. 

http://www.wfnz.com/media/audio-channel/mac-attack-alex-marvez-strong-take-panthers

 

 

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. The idea of the man who tried to trade our first round pick which ended up being first overall Cam Newton, for the 1st pick in the second round to grab Jimmy Clausen, is back in charge. Flipping unbelievable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, xav8tor said:

One thing is certain...he did not close the door to staying longer during the FNZ interview. He had two opportunities to do so, and didn't.

He sounded like a man who knew the job was his for the long haul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...