Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers with 12 former 1st round picks in 2 deep, EASILY tops in the league


Nails

Recommended Posts

Disclaimer-the draft is an inexact science.  But, for the most part, draft capital matters.  By my estimation our draft capital that'll take the field swallows the rest of the league whole.  Please check my math or correct me if I'm wrong, but no other team even has as many as 10 former 1st round picks in their 2 deep.  Much less a former #1 overall pick MVP at QB, a top 10 DPOY, FIVE former top 10 picks, eight top 15, and 16 in the top 45.  

Homerism aside, we have the most talented roster in the NFL by a long shot if draft capital means anything (and, it does).  It's shockingly not remotely close.

Thoughts?  Correct me if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really interesting info.

Can you break it down further...

Panthers total 1st rounders Total and by Offense / Defense.

I probably should be able to come up with the total in my head, but I'm not really able to focus on football today, in the middle of some other stuff.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KB_fan said:

Really interesting info.

Can you break it down further...

Panthers total 1st rounders Total and by Offense / Defense.

I probably should be able to come up with the total in my head, but I'm not really able to focus on football today, in the middle of some other stuff.

 

 

I also don't have time today.  What I really want to do is use this chart for our entire roster, add it up, and compare it to every other team's 53 man roster by draft value points.  I'm guessing it's not even remotely close how many more "points" our roster has.  http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/draft/draft-trade-chart/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I believe that draft capital means something to varying degrees, but it's not the be-all-end-all. You obviously can't ignore it, as historically it's the first and second rounders that have the most staying power on a percentage basis, but talent comes from every round, and sometimes no round at all. 

If you do your homework correctly, your first and second rounders are supposed to stay and start in this league (at some point), and hopefully with you. It's after those first couple of rounds that helps separate the men from the boys or the wheat from the chaff in terms of franchises that sustain excellence and those that perennially flounder around. Moreover, it's also the front offices that can acquire first and second round talent, or just talent, period, that fits who keep themselves in contention. So although drafting and retaining "2 deep" talent helps, it's but a part of determining the overall quality of a franchise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I count 19 in total...this is based on the ourlads depth chart. Are you just counting players the Panthers actually drafted or players drafted, acquired via trade, FA, etc.? 

Offense (11): K.Benjamin; D.Funchess; C.Samuels; M.Kalil; A.Silatolu; R.Kalil; T.Moton; G.Olsen; C.Newton; J.Stewart; C.McCaffrey

Defense (8): S.Lotulelei; K.Short; V.Butler; J.Peppers; S.Thompson; L.Kuechly; T.Davis; J.Bradberry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cardiaccat52 said:

I count 19 in total...this is based on the ourlads depth chart. Are you just counting players the Panthers actually drafted or players drafted, acquired via trade, FA, etc.? 

Offense (11): K.Benjamin; D.Funchess; C.Samuels; M.Kalil; A.Silatolu; R.Kalil; T.Moton; G.Olsen; C.Newton; J.Stewart; C.McCaffrey

Defense (8): S.Lotulelei; K.Short; V.Butler; J.Peppers; S.Thompson; L.Kuechly; T.Davis; J.Bradberry

I was only counting 1st round picks (12).  And 1st AND high 2nd round picks (top 45 overall) (16?).  

Further analysis can be done and is appreciated-and will NO DOUBT show our draft value is FAR superior to any other team, with no close second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...