Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Ringer On Superbowl Contenders - Panthers "Hard To Find A Flaw"


Saca312

Recommended Posts

A very bold statement indeed. Robert Mays of the NFL show known as "The Ringer" says the Carolina Panthers have no flaws, saying it's hard to find one at 30:42.

If you look at our starters, it's very hard to find any flaws indeed. Sure, our WRs have a lot to prove, but they're doing work at preseason and on the practice field. Can't say much until the regular season actually starts. Sure, safety and corner depth are concerns, but starters are very stout. 

Otherwise, I agree. Very hard to find any flaws at all. What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true. Maybe you have more time than I do to go into more in depth on draft capital/value on our roster compared to others, but it doesn't take long to see we have the most talented roster in the entire NFL, by far.  #fact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, sharkkiller said:

In before someone says "Shula"

Well is our players aren't very flawed and we are a losing team...one can only use logic and look elsewhere.

 

Apply that to years going back to 1996 and there you'll find the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

The biggest weakness on the team is the coaching staff.  Specifically Rivera, Shula, and Dorsey.  There are other coaches that are good.  But, that is clearly our biggest weakness.  Always has been.  

People have talked about being nervous about San Francisco.  IF we lose that game, we should not have a coach.  The team should take over,  Varsity Blues style.  Cam and TD the captains of the O and D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

I'm a homer and there's no way I'd say we have no flaws. This guy is crazy

It's all relative.  Hopefully Gano is cut-our only MAJOR flaw would be keeping his sorry a$$ on a relatively big contract.  Our other flaws are relatively minor to even other contenders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before any of our tackles prove they can at least be a solid starter (and no, Williams has not, he was beaten out by Remmers for a reason), I find a huge one. 

But hey, it's the preseason. Every teams* fan base are allowed to dream.

*Except the tankning Jets of course 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sharkkiller said:

In before someone says "Shula"

nice work.  The over/under for "shula" whining by someone who has never played a down of football much less been responsible for an NFL offense is generally 7.5 posts.  It came a little early this time so good job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...