Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

At this point why is DA over Webb?


Ivan The Awesome

Recommended Posts

DA has been on the decline for years now. 'b-b-b-but he won against Tampa', no the defense and the rest of the team won against Tampa. DA came along for the ride.  I've seem a steady decline in his game and an increase in Webbs play for a while now. Webb is a special teams ace but I think it's time to give him more of a back up role and cut DA.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, maybe y'all are right, but this is one game---another game against second and third stringers. 

You guys can fool yourselves about Webb all you like, but his decision making is on par at best with DA's, and he's still not as good of a passer. Put him in against the starters and you'll see the imperfect web he weaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

So what you're saying is no, he's not getting cut.. 

I'm not completely ruling it out. But he's a Rivera favorite, he knows the offense, and with the questions about Cam's shoulder, that's even more incentive to keep him around. Honestly that game sealing INT at the end of the Bucs game at home last year should have been enough to set in motion the task of looking for his replacement. We had the opportunity in the offseason, it's too little too late now unless we just promote Webb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Smith-Wade for me. He has the path to some decent hefty snaps in Evero’s scheme. He held his own last year and improved as he continued to get snaps— If he makes some strides, could be a very capable nickel.  I agree with Sanders. Bryce had some trust in him that final Falcons game post crazy head-stand.  Bryce looked for him a lot that final game and made some critical catches to get us the W. Seems he’s put in major work so I’m hopeful about him.  Wallace will have an offseason under his belt. I like him a lot, was higher graded than most remember in his draft (I.e Brugler had him LB3/70 overall) but he isn’t as cerebral of an LB as we’re used to. I think he could thrive if we get D captain/film-junky type next to him— because right now that’s Jewell.  Still a bit cautious but love the talent. Rozeboom may snag some playing time from him if he’s still working out the kinks.
    • Didnt Canales already say starters are playing in the pre season? either way extra reps dont hurt but im not one of those people that think playing in the pre season would have saved Bryce from an awful start.
    • very helpful.  I read back in this thread where they might try Jarvis at C--I thought he and Aho had good chemistry, however.  Nonetheless, he could expand his value there, and now we have a guy who can play jarvis' spot.  Freddie is a pro, no doubt--and as little as I know about the inner workings of strategy and positions, I could tell Burns was burning us at times.  I figured he'd retire and I was looking forward to it.  FWIW, they have Jarvis listed as a C on the 2025-26 roster.
×
×
  • Create New...