Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Browns are trying to move Joe Haden


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Just an FYI: Haden graded out worse than Worley on PFF.

Let that sink in.

Said the same thing about Roman Harper ..

 

I was wrong..

Bringing in competition isn't a bad thing if prices  is right..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Catufb85 said:

Haden struggled becuz browns front 7 was bad. When you can't pressure QBs makes any CB look bad. Worley struggled with our front 7.  Haden would benefit in our scheme and our front 7.  Norman type big CB. 

Exactly. How much of Hadens poor play was a direct result of a browns D-line who only managed 26 sacks in 2016?. Tied for 2nd worst in the league. 

www.espn.com/nfl/statistics/team/_/stat/defense

IMG_20170830_094705.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Never fluffed that one up. But yes, I do agree he's raw in terms of his route running. Don't think I ever disputed that either.

But I do disagree with the notion he's not a deep threat.

And I'm not saying he can't be a deep threat either. I'm literally just saying he's raw and grabbing Dorsett to fill our Ginn role wouldn't be a bad thing.

This isn't a Dorsett vs Samuel thing or a Samuel can't do this or that. All I'm saying is Dorsett would be a good fill in for Ginn. Too much speed is NEVER a bad thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

And I'm not saying he can't be a deep threat either. I'm literally just saying he's raw and grabbing Dorsett to fill our Ginn role wouldn't be a bad thing.

This isn't a Dorsett vs Samuel thing or a Samuel can't do this or that. All I'm saying is Dorsett would be a good fill in for Ginn. Too much speed is NEVER a bad thing

Giving up a daft pick for a guy who may not even see the field isn't wise. If he is a fa sure but your taking on cap and cost for a guy who is not going to contribute much. I get your idea but it's a risk with not much reward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...