Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Upon further review....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Oline screw up

Kalil and Norwell blocking the same guy.  Kalil looked like he thought the TE was gonna pick up the DE.  Not sure who missed assignment, but it sure looked preseason(ish).  Cam had no chance on that one.  Rusher coming from his backside, nobody open.  Just a bad play on the Oline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sloppy first 2 games, and then a bad saints game that is obviously wrecking worlds.

im still holding out hope for a rebound game next week and hopefully these things will get better as the season goes on.

the only thing that is REALLY concerning me is Cams throwing. I'm no football expert or medical doctor. This electrician notices that cams throwing motion looks forced and his deep threat is seriously hampered by the awkward push he's giving it. Mental mistakes can be overcome. Physical ailments need actual time and rest to heal, and then brought back up to strength again through more time and conditioning. I don't believe that cam's shoulder is good yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stirs said:

Oline screw up

Kalil and Norwell blocking the same guy.  Kalil looked like he thought the TE was gonna pick up the DE.  Not sure who missed assignment, but it sure looked preseason(ish).  Cam had no chance on that one.  Rusher coming from his backside, nobody open.  Just a bad play on the Oline

Slide protection. Kalil slid right when he was supposed to slide left. 100% his fault. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

I could have laid down a blanket and had a picnic in the middle of the field. 

 

Saints safety looks bored. 

This is why Greg Olsen is the key part of our offense. He'd likely draw double coverage in this situation in the middle of the field, it's easy for the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I will as soon as you withdraw your fandom from the Patriots. Informative threads are great but all of these estrogen and emotion driven threads you start are ridiculous.
    • Will be there tonight and expect nothing from the Canes. They are soft and won't go after anyone, nor will they respond when, not if, Florida starts bullying them. Not to mention Freddie is in net. I fear this will be an ass-kicking.  
    • Is this not a bit contradictory?  Also surely if any of us are smart enough to evaluate what we're seeing in real time, a former NFL QB can at least manage the same.  Especially considering he's basing his analysis on hours (maybe generous?) of reviewing All-22 footage which he can play back over and over again, focusing each time on different position groups, match-ups, progressions, etc. which is simply impossible for a fan to fully assess in real time.  Unless you're actually at the game, we basically only get the QB/O-line in frame during the broadcast and even in that limited window of the field, there is simply too much happening.  I'm usually broadly focusing on Bryce, maybe peeping the footwork (or lack thereof) and just the overall pocket and whether there is any pressure coming.  I'm not able to watch every individual one-on-one o-line match-up on top of it to see who got beat, who didn't pick up a blitz, which o-lineman didn't shift to help double-team, or whatever else. I think the truth is somewhere in between (as is almost always the case).  Knowing the play call, audible, etc. is pretty important when judging individual performances, which is why we should always take PFF grades with a grain of salt.  But yeah we can also get a pretty good overall sense of how a player is performing just from watching the game on the couch on Sundays.  I still think there's a lot of value in a review video like this.  As long as you have the bare minimum media literacy to take the interesting insights while also acknowledging inherent biases from a video like this (i.e. obviously focusing on the good over the bad).
×
×
  • Create New...