Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers must not abandon the run on Sunday


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

I agree and I disagree.

I agree because any kind of gameplan outside of Shula's comfort zone is sure to be a disaster.

I disagree in that I seriously doubt we outscore NE by pounding the ball and running up that valuable TOP instead of points.

If it was me, at this point, I'd go hurry-up no huddle the whole damn game.  What the hell, couldn't be any worse than what we've been doing.  (P.S. And, no, I don't think there's a chance in hell of Ron or Mike even considering such a thing.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First series the first play will be a go route to Benjamin, results imcomplete, overythrown by 5 yrds.  Second play will be CMC up the gut for no gain.  Third play is a Stewart run to the outside, tackled for a 2 yard loss.  Punt.  Rinse and repeat. Ron will stand on the sideline with a blank stare on his face while Shula sits in the booth picking his nose trying to figure why the guys just can't execute his plays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense will have to get after Brady all game. Even if we have to do a lot of blitzing. They cannot let me stand in a clean pocket like they did Breez or this game will be over by end of the 1st quarter. They will need to hit Brady as often as possible to push him out of his comfort zone. If the defense can do this then sticking with the running game will be possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's going to be hard to consider that when we are running all over them killing clock all game that's the way we will win time mangement 

Winning with the run game, thereby eating up the clock, is something that we have a history of success with. However, when it comes to time management, who the hell have you been watching, 'cause it sure ain't us. Besides that, we eat more clock via Shula trying to get plays in than we do with ball control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Farachlombardi said:

We are very good just got to look at the big picture of it all and not just the delay of games 

In it's current state, very good and our offense cannot be used in the same sentence unless you put an isn't in front of very good. Blind homerism is counterproductive in the same way our FO and coaching staff's resistance to change is. Watch Belichick's presser.  He's very complementary of Cam, Luke and core, and even Shula. He's acutely aware of our strengths, but as expected, makes no mention of our flaws. However, he sure does harp on his own, and astutely states when questioned that the first task is to recognize that you have a problem. Then, step by step, address and attack the biggest issues first, fixing 17, 18, however many things there are, until you're done. That doesn't happen in this organization. THAT is looking at the big picture, and every brush stroke in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...