Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When should players be benched for lack of effort..


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

I’m pretty sure that everyone on the Huddle will agree that the players on offense are showing a lack of effort that even a blind person can see. It’s not only a lack of effort but a lack of execution as well. Yes, Shula shoulders some of the blame for this but there have been plays where if the guys hit their blocks or catch the ball big yards can be gained.

i know it’s very early in the season but am just interested to see what you guys/gals think. If this continues then at what point does Ron need to show he has a pair and bench the slackers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If they are wearing a tie, max effort has been given."

RR on player effort October 2017

On a serious note, I don't think RR will bench anybody due to "lack of effort".  While I agree that it appears not everyone is giving 100% all the time, I feel this has to do with the coaching and the environment they foster and a lack of discipline. 

Did you watch the Miami v Syracuse game this weekend? Dino Barber made one of his players do push ups on the sidelines for not knowing where his helmet is! Accountability.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had a short post about this in another thread.

"This is when being a "players coach" bites you in the rear."

 

When the going is good, it's great.  Smiles everywhere, laughing, easygoing locker room, light practices, etc....

When the going gets tough....it's hard to bring down the hammer.  Hard to sit 17 for a half because of his piss poor effort.  Hard to cut a player to give the rest of the team something to think about.  Hard to get in your OC's face and demand better performances, or it's his ass.

 

Some coaches are good for some teams...problem is, teams change.  Some are rebuilding (where I think Ron's best fit is), some are young playoff hopeful teams, some are grizzled vets pushing for a Super Bowl.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I hope he finds his lane in year 2.  Now that we signed Walker, I'm really intrigued how Dan feels about the DL. Is there a piece there in R1 that presents value/BPA and fills a void for one of the spots w/ DB and Wharton.  I'll give Wharton another year to show us why he was signed here. With A'Shawn gone, I don't think BBIII is it.  Our edges are set and our LBs are balanced. Horn/Mike Jack and Moehrig will hold the secondary together. DB is, well...DB.  However, I think this is an area that is the biggest question mark right now. I see 1 of 3 spots that are locked and loaded for us. If we move to a 4 down front, I assume Phillips would slide down to be the additional linemen, but we still have questions about the other two spots in either scheme.  I'd feel better with a tradeback, but I do wonder how McDonald would do here. Maybe Woods....but McDonald really does peek my interest.  Or, can Jackson take that next step. The coaching staff speaks highly of him for what little he played. Here's hoping he stays healthy and comes into TC with something to prove. There's a spot to be taken, here's hoping he takes it.
    • Not many people talking about DT, but we have a need.  (DE)  Now this guy is a NT like Brown III
×
×
  • Create New...