Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I know it's not keen, but man. Props to Gettlemen again. At least when our QB goes down, we can still win games.

JakeDel5674

By JakeDel5674,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Jesse Rising Star

Jesse

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, KillerKat said:

No we can't. Have you seen Anderson lately? He should be retired already.

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Jesse said:

I think OP is referring to the fact that not only is their offense terrible without Aaron Rodgers, but their defense is just as bad, if not worse. At least we have the backbone to be successful if Cam is out (hint: great defense).

Correct.  Thank you, sir.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, micnificent28 said:

I don’t think this is fair... they had a plan in place and Brett Hundley was highly thought of as a prospect and the packers had gotten offers for him for a year or so,they just thought he was a good back up. Sometime plans to work out.. but they had a plan.

Hundley coming out of UCLA was garbage.  He had like the most interceptions in that Pac-12 that year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
JakeDel5674 Newbie

JakeDel5674

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

No Cam, means no running game, no running games means no milking the clock, which in return means this defense would suffer.

We would be just as bad

Do you see what the Packers have on Defense right now?  No fuging way we would be just as bad as they are.  They are pure garbage.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • OldhamA
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By OldhamA · Posted

      From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • CmC2k
      Panthers Blueprint: Draft

      By CmC2k · Posted

      Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...