Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential Postseason Advantage


dldove77

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RelaxImaPro said:

The Chicago game combined with the litany of dumbass coaching moments and fug ups on offense we've seen this year have really tempered my expectations for the season.  Hoping for 12-4 but expecting 10-6, or hell, even worse.  We've got the potential to be good once we get out of our own way.  Until then, I just don't see it happening this season.

Would obviously love to be wrong tho

The Chicago game was two insanely fluky plays that changed everything.  That game is over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nails said:

The Chicago game was two insanely fluky plays that changed everything.  That game is over.

This is true, but the team gave up after those fluky plays...that bothered me more than the loss.

I still can't get that coaching job out of my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Castavar said:

God, I hope that stupid fluky loss to the Bears doesn't come back to bite us in the ass. That was one annoying loss.

It’s possible but doubtful.  We still control our #2 seed destiny and the Eagles game, not the Bears, will be what (likely) cost us the #1 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nails said:

I do.  Odds are we might drop one in New Orleans or Atlanta but even if we split those we’re 12-4.  New Orleans simply isn’t good enough to sweep us IMO, we’ll have Olsen, and we have a winning record all time down there.

The Falcons can beat us too of course but might have nothing to play for.

50/50 at worst odds for both games.

Unfortunately the Aints look to be legit, barring a huge breakdown they could easily sweep us. Pretty sure the Falcons didn’t have much to play for last year and ended our unbeaten streak... anything can happen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Unfortunately the Aints look to be legit, barring a huge breakdown they could easily sweep us. Pretty sure the Falcons didn’t have much to play for last year and ended our unbeaten streak... anything can happen

Better odds they lose 2 of their next 3 than win 2 of their next 3.  They’re not legit.  Same mediocre garbage they’ve been for over half a decade, that’s already blown their load this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, thomas96 said:

We're going to be 12-4 or 13-3.

yep. i share this mindset. Vikings and Saints will provide challenges, but are both entirely winnable. Packers will just be getting Rodgers back and he'll either be rusty, or wont play. 28-3, nuff said. and the Dolphins, Jets, and Bucs are scrubs to pad our win total. the Jets and Dolphins could be sneaky teams that could shock us if we dont show up to play, but im hoping the players learned their lesson about that after Chicago.

Would not surprise me at all if we dont lose another game. Cam seems very VERY excited to get Greg back, and thus we should be too. i bet we see our offense take off down in New Orleans when Greg has had a week to get back in the active roster routine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UpstatePanther said:

yep. i share this mindset. Vikings and Saints will provide challenges, but are both entirely winnable. Packers will just be getting Rodgers back and he'll either be rusty, or wont play. 28-3, nuff said. and the Dolphins, Jets, and Bucs are scrubs to pad our win total. the Jets and Dolphins could be sneaky teams that could shock us if we dont show up to play, but im hoping the players learned their lesson about that after Chicago.

Would not surprise me at all if we dont lose another game. Cam seems very VERY excited to get Greg back, and thus we should be too. i bet we see our offense take off down in New Orleans when Greg has had a week to get back in the active roster routine.

Don't think Rodgers will be back for that game, I think he's likely to miss the year. Even if he could be healthy enough to make it back when eligible, I doubt they win a game before then and will be eliminated from the playoffs. They'd look and see what happened to Romo against us in '15 and no chance they play him. Should be the easiest game on our schedule as they are as bad as any team in the league without Rodgers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11-5

I don't see us beating New Orleans and Atlanta in their house.  Our defense can hold its own but if our offense doesn't come alive this last 7 weeks we are in trouble.

10-6 would not surprise me because Minnesota has a nasty defense.  We are at home so we might sneak this one out.  Good defenses have given us fits.  Olsen should help change this offense.

 Hopefully, Rodgers doesn't come back for our game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...