Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers wide receivers from a college standpoint


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

If Cam continues to produce with ragtag group it’s truly a miracle. Imagine the day this team actually dedicates resources to get some legit receivers 

 

Funchess - was a TE until his last year at Michigan, his career high was under 750 yards in a season

Shepard - Had more rushing yards than receiving yards at LSU, was a dual threat QB in HS and was recruited as a QB

Samuel - Also had more rushing yards than receiving, his career high was around 800 yards, mostly swing and screen passes 

Clay - Mainly used as a returner at Utah.

Byrd - situational deep threat who never had more than 600 yards receiving 

 

Bersin was actually the most productive college receiver 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think this organization will ever properly address the position.

With that said, they’ll have ANOTHER golden opportunity this offseason when the 2014 draft class become FA’s (minus 1st rounder who have had their options picked up).

Just give me Dante Pettis in the draft please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Samuel - Also had more rushing yards than receiving, his career high was around 700 yards, mostly swing and screen passes 

Lol sorry, but that's completely false and probably the worst take I've seen yet.

Curtis Samuel is nothing of what you said. 

Curtis Samuel is a WR who can play RB - not the other way around. Per Pro Football Focus, Samuel had 220 snaps from the backfield, much less than his 425 snaps from the slot. He's more experienced as a wide-receiver than as runningback.

So yes, Curtis Samuel is indeed a better receiver than a rusher. In fact, it could be argued he's the class' best route runner.

During his Junior year, Samuel accumulated 865 yards and seven touchdowns on 74 receptions, averaging 11.7 yards per reception. He ranked second in the conference in all three metrics, and was named a member of the first-team All-Big Ten as a wide receiver. Curtis Samuel is the only player in Ohio State history to finish with 1,000+ yards rushing and 1,000+ yards receiving.

But tell me more about how he's a runningback playing wide receiver. Just as bad as saying Cam Newton's a runningback playing quarterback.

Here's my twitter thread where I go over eight games from Curtis Samuel available on the internet.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Saca312 said:

Lol sorry, but that's completely false and probably the worst take I've seen yet.

Curtis Samuel is nothing of what you said. 

Curtis Samuel is a WR who can play RB - not the other way around. Per Pro Football Focus, Samuel had 220 snaps from the backfield, much less than his 425 snaps from the slot. He's more experienced as a wide-receiver than as runningback.

So yes, Curtis Samuel is indeed a better receiver than a rusher. In fact, it could be argued he's the class' best route runner.

During his Junior year, Samuel accumulated 865 yards and seven touchdowns on 74 receptions, averaging 11.7 yards per reception. He ranked second in the conference in all three metrics, and was named a member of the first-team All-Big Ten as a wide receiver. Curtis Samuel is the only player in Ohio State history to finish with 1,000+ yards rushing and 1,000+ yards receiving.

But tell me more about how he's a runningback playing wide receiver. Just as bad as saying Cam Newton's a runningback playing quarterback.

Here's my twitter thread where I go over eight games from Curtis Samuel available on the internet.

 

With hands like a running back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Saca312 said:

Lol sorry, but that's completely false and probably the worst take I've seen yet.

Curtis Samuel is nothing of what you said. 

Curtis Samuel is a WR who can play RB - not the other way around. Per Pro Football Focus, Samuel had 220 snaps from the backfield, much less than his 425 snaps from the slot. He's more experienced as a wide-receiver than as runningback.

So yes, Curtis Samuel is indeed a better receiver than a rusher. In fact, it could be argued he's the class' best route runner.

During his Junior year, Samuel accumulated 865 yards and seven touchdowns on 74 receptions, averaging 11.7 yards per reception. He ranked second in the conference in all three metrics, and was named a member of the first-team All-Big Ten as a wide receiver. Curtis Samuel is the only player in Ohio State history to finish with 1,000+ yards rushing and 1,000+ yards receiving.

But tell me more about how he's a runningback playing wide receiver. Just as bad as saying Cam Newton's a runningback playing quarterback.

Here's my twitter thread where I go over eight games from Curtis Samuel available on the internet.

 

Samuel had 1286 rushing yards on  a 172 attempts, he  had 1249 receiving yards on 107 catches 

 

How am I wrong again?

 

And if you think he was this class best route runner, you know nothing about to football.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, My Goodness My Guinness said:

If we could grab a solid receiver in the 3rd or 4th round I'd be ecstatic. Not gonna happen with Hurndog drafting though. I think we have greater needs in the 1st and 2nd like safety and O-line. I guess it all depends on how the draft plays out though. 

Screw the draft we need a bonafied free agent wide receiver. Someone like Desean Jackson or Sammy Watkins 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Samuel had 1286 rushing yards on  a 172 attempts, he  had 1249 receiving yards on 107 catches 

 

How am I wrong again?

 

And if you think he was this class best route runner, you know nothing about to football.

Um because he had more snaps from the slot than the backfield.

how is that hard to comprehend?

And there’s plenty of analysts who agree that Curtis may be the best route runner. Matt Waldman, Josh Norris, and plenty other draft analysts rave on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Screw the draft we need a bonafied free agent wide receiver. Someone like Desean Jackson or Sammy Watkins 

This. We have enough youngsters to develop. If we add another WR, I'd greatly prefer a vet. An actual WR vet, not a career special teamer. We paid Shepard to be something that he simply isn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Um because he had more snaps from the slot than the backfield.

how is that hard to comprehend?

And there’s plenty of analysts who agree that Curtis may be the best route runner. Matt Waldman, Josh Norris, and plenty other draft analysts rave on him.

Where did I say he was better rb than receiver? I’m just stating the facts.

 

And I can find draft expert after expert saying he’s not even a top 5 route runner in this class, guys like Juju, Kupp and Zay Jones were leagues ahead of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

Where did I say he was better rb than receiver? I’m just stating the facts.

 

And I can find draft expert after expert saying he’s not even a top 5 route runner in this class, guys like Juju, Kupp and Zay Jones were leagues ahead of him.

Samuel was (is) raw as hell as a WR. He was a jack of all trades player in college. Saca is out of his mind on this one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Samuel was (is) raw as hell as a WR. He was a jack of all trades player in college. Saca is out of his mind on this one. 

Yep, his route tree at OSU 90% of the time was screen, swing pass or drag. That’s like saying Tavon Austin is an elite route runner 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...