Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The South Will Come Down To The Falcons & Panthers.


TheCableGuy

Recommended Posts

So for us to win the division, we have to win out and the falcons have to beat the saints.

For us to just make the playoffs, we either need to win the next two games or just beat the Falcons.

note: if the falcons don’t beat the saints and we win our next two there is no reason for us to play starters versus the Falcons, yeah it will be nice to get a win and ride a 3 game win streak into the playoffs but it does nothing for us from a playoff standings point of view since we won’t be able to jump the saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Nope Falcons losing to the Bucs this week and it'll come down to the Aints and us but with us controlling our destiny after the Aints lose to the Falcons again.

this is really the most ideal senario and its not impossible either. I could see the Falcons sort of looking ahead to their huge last 2 games vs Saints and Panthers, and throw a clunker against the Bucs. And then they'd rebound by sweeping the Saints at their place. 

That would put us in a commanding lead for the South, and we take care of business at ATL , that means we're 12- 4, won the division, and have a decent seed in the playoffs depending on if the Rams, Vikes , dropped another game or 2, we could be the 2 seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AggieLean said:

This. It’s quite a scary thought.

Not likely, we have the Bucs that’s a win, and I’d say it’s in our favor to beat either GB with or without Rodgers or the falcons. To beat or get beat by both those teams in unlikely tho.

been saying for a while I thought we would go 11-5 and I still think that. Only pity is that would win you the division any year but this year apparently. And we haven’t played an easy schedule either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've got another viral Panthers song The dab is back Jags Week 1, Ohio State National Title, JLo got divorced...   Nature is healing, it's Super Bowl time
    • Its too late for that.  Time has run out.  You dont give him a ext if he plays "decent".  He played "decent" at the end of last year and look what happened.  
    • I’m not necessarily advocating sticking with Bryce. His highs show the ability is there, but there’s enough bad film out there to doubt that he can consistently enough play at a high enough level. But this video from Brett Kollman is a pretty good argument to give it a bit more time, whether that be rolling with Bryce just next year or picking up his 5th year option (not extending him).      The gist is that the structural (wider hashes) and rule (3 yd vs 1 yd thresholds for intelligible offensive lineman downfield penalties) differences in the college and NFL have led to wildly different play calling and scheme diets in college. There is much more shotgun and RPO calls in college and screen/quick throws. This simply doesn’t set up young QBs to be able to play under center, which is more preferred in the NFL due to RBs being able to more effectively run out of that formation.  They don’t know how to do it and have to learn. Yes, the NFL has trended more toward college style offense in the last decade or so, but it isn’t that pronounced and is more out of necessity than desire. And on top of all that, they ask the young QBs to do all this learning with coaching and other personnel churn going on around them.  Bad results lead to coaches getting fired and new ones with different ideas on scheme and footwork and different terminology and playbooks coming in. It makes it harder on those young QBs to learn.     So we may drop Bryce for a young QB starter in the draft and be in a similar situation. With a QB who is going to take years to learn how to operate in an NFL style offense and will struggle along the way.  So you have to weigh whether the struggles we see from Bryce are more due to this learning process vs solely physical limitations on his part. It’s almost undoubtedly a bit of both, but the answer to that question I think dictates your strategy at QB over the next few years. And of course, you have to consider what the alternatives available are.    I’m neither a Bryce hater or a Bryce Stan and I don’t have an answer to that question. But I do fear that if we move on from him, unless it’s for an established player, we’re just in for continued frustration on the QB front because it’s going to take a few years for a college QB to develop (Drake Maye’s don’t grow on trees). 
×
×
  • Create New...