Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Schefter - Giants interviewed Gettleman today


MVPccaffrey

Recommended Posts

 

The best GM by far in Panthers history, fired by our creep owner, is potentially about to take a job with one of the most well run franchises in NFL history, and a top 2 pick to start things off. 

 

Why oh why couldn't mister shake-your-rump have gotten exposed an offseason ago sigh

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Camvp said:

 

The best GM by far in Panthers history, fired by our creep owner, is potentially about to take a job with one of the most well run franchises in NFL history, and a top 2 pick to start things off. 

 

Why oh why couldn't mister shake-your-rump have gotten exposed an offseason ago sigh

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's up with the love affair with DG? He was great at managing the cap but aside from that, he was average at best. missed countless times in the draft, signed some horrible free agents, and single handedly cost us a playoff birth in 2016. 

not to mention people hated him, including TD and Olsen, which is saying a lot.

maybe Hurney isn't the answer, but the Panthers can do far better than DG. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

What's up with the love affair with DG? He was great at managing the cap but aside from that, he was average at best. missed countless times in the draft, signed some horrible free agents, and single handedly cost us a playoff birth in 2016. 

not to mention people hated him, including TD and Olsen, which is saying a lot.

maybe Hurney isn't the answer, but the Panthers can do far better than DG. 

Fixed the shitshow that Hurney created

Signed vets/contributors at low prices

Cut said vets when they weren't producing and didn't over pay* (*Matt Kalil excluded. Can't defend that one, hated it from the get go. But still, vast vast majority of his signings didn't hurt us financially)

Put together a super Bowl team while cash strapped

Re-signed Luke and Cam

Drafted in the mid to late 20's as opposed to the 10's so it's kind of expected the best talent wouldn't always be available, but he still got decent guys. Not all first round picks are equal.

4 out of 5 years in which he put a team together they went to the playoffs* (*pending a victory this sunday)

Had the most successful 5 year span this team has ever had. 

Not a cuck like Hurney

brought us the term "Hogmollies"

Gettleman might not have been the best GM ever, but he's certainly the best we've ever had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dldove77 said:

DG's actions with Josh Norman are enough to be on my hate list for life. 

Honestly couldn't give less of a poo about it. 

Norman wouldn't have fixed last season. It was injuries that did us in. 

Plus if we had Norman we wouldn't have Peppers again, Short locked up long term, Addison, and the option to re-sign either Norwell or Star this offseason, possibly both. 

But the redskins have Norman and his 20 million/year contract and will have missed the playoffs in consecutive years while having to decide on whether or not to keep paying him or a franchise friggin QB.

Keeping Norman in a Rivera defensive scheme is short sighted and a poor allocation of funds. He was a luxury, and it would have been nice to have had him, but he would probably be gone this year anyway and we wouldn't have been in as good of a position financially for the long term. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Honestly couldn't give less of a poo about it. 

Norman wouldn't have fixed last season. It was injuries that did us in. 

Plus if we had Norman we wouldn't have Peppers again, Short locked up long term, Addison, and the option to re-sign either Norwell or Star this offseason, possibly both. 

But the redskins have Norman and his 20 million/year contract and will have missed the playoffs in consecutive years while having to decide on whether or not to keep paying him or a franchise friggin QB.

Keeping Norman in a Rivera defensive scheme is short sighted and a poor allocation of funds. He was a luxury, and it would have been nice to have had him, but he would probably be gone this year anyway and we wouldn't have been in as good of a position financially for the long term. 

So that's one hate list and one not hate list. 

Whether we kept him long term or not, it was handled poorly. He's not my kind of guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Cracka McNasty said:

Fixed the shitshow that Hurney created

Signed vets/contributors at low prices

Cut said vets when they weren't producing and didn't over pay

Put together a super Bowl team while cash strapped

Re-signed Luke and Cam

Drafted in the mid to late 20's as opposed to the 10's so it's kind of expected the best talent wouldn't always be available, but he still got decent guys. Not all first round picks are equal.

4 out of 5 years in which he put a team together they went to the playoffs* (*pending a victory this sunday)

Had the most successful 5 year span this team has ever had. 

Not a cuck like Hurney

brought us the term "Hogmollies"

Gettleman might not have been the best GM ever, but he's certainly the best we've ever had. 

If you are going to give him credit for all his successes, then you have to also give him credit for his failures - and he did have some big ones.  Rescinding franchise tag on Norman was a colossal mistake that completely changed the trajectory (and not in a good way) of our 2016 season.  He is a cost-first type of guy with a take it or leave it approach.  I think if he had worked with Norman a little bit he would have stayed (and for less than what Washington gave him).  After that mishap, he then proceeded to give turnstile M. Kalil $55 mil which still doesn't make sense (and even more so given his focus on the bottom line).

Overall I think his positives outweighed his negatives and will agree he was a very solid GM.  Just dont be surprised when he sends Eli packing and alienates himself to entire Giants fanbase in his first year...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...