Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Panthers lose this week to the Bucs...


hepcat

Recommended Posts

Hasn't this thread been started every week since the loss at ATL?

The difference is my glossy articulate insight on the Panthers sets apart the joke threads from the ones that not only offer competent information on the Panthers, but makes you re-evaluate your life as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I mean, if you can't beat poo teams...it means you are one. A loss here or next week and they are playing for pride and future jobs from that point on.

reality is the season is already over....

put if we want to be optmistic they need to get to 3-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is your definition of season over? My stance is 1-3 teams who struggle to beat 1 of the 5 worst teams in the NFL do not win Superbowl's.

Looks like last year the Steelers struggled to beat the Browns.

I'm not saying that the Panthers are going to win the big one, but it should be known that Superbowl teams don't always have pretty wins against the worst teams in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like last year the Steelers struggled to beat the Browns.

I'm not saying that the Panthers are going to win the big one, but it should be known that Superbowl teams don't always have pretty wins against the worst teams in the NFL

The Steelers led the entire game and they did not loose 3 games in a row prior to struggling against the Browns. Nice try though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the fact that someone posted this question already means it is. if one more loss can cause "fans" to totally shut it down then you may as well pack it in now and leave room for others.

at 0-15 i'll still be excited for next weeks games b/c with a young team you like to monitor how everyone is progressing. it gives you a reason to get excited when the playoffs are already out of the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The year we went to the superbowl we lost 3 games in a row at one point in that season. We just lost 3 in a row this season. The difference is we started out 6 and 0 the superbowl year, and our division wasn't that good. This year we started out 0 and 3 and our division is very good.

Now, every year since Fox has been here we have functioned about the same. We could beat any team in the league, but at the same time we could lose to any team in the league. When we went to the superbowl we weren't dominating teams, we were squeaking by and getting the win at the end. Last year when we finished 12 and 4 we didn't dominate but we would end up winning. Now there are some exceptions here and there but thats usually how it would happen.

In my opinion I beleive Jon Fox's best coaching job was the year we started off 1 and 7, then ended up finishing 7 and 9. The second half of that season we were pretty much on fire. It's the best I have ever seen the Panthers play. Steve Smith was on IR, Stephen Davis went down, and so did Foster. But it was Jake's best year by far. Peppers was also making spectacular plays left and right. We ended up losing to Atlanta on that controversial Mike Vick hydroplane into the endzone, and we lost to the Saints the very last game of the year to knock us out of playoff contention.

Now I don't know if we can make a run like that, but I can hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got the feeling with how we came out on Sunday that the team may have packed it in already. Luckily for us the Redskins were terrible and are in the process of packing it in as well.

I heard something on the radio that Week 2 and Week 3 are the most important in the NFL season, in that at the beginning of the year, every team believes they have a chance to be a playoff team, but in Week 2 and Week 3, certain teams that have fallen to 0-3 or 1-2 will realize they're not very good, and most of the players on these teams will start just playing to cash their paychecks, without giving a lot of thought to W's and L's. I fear that we may become one of those teams (won't know until after the next couple of games) -- and I hope that I am completely wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...