Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if a team tied every game they played?

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted

I know it's nearly impossible for that to happen, but what if some team went 0-0-16? Now granted, there would be 13 other teams out there with tie games, and including all the teams in your division would have 2. What would a situation like that...entail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

unlike hockey you go no points for a tie. What would it entail??

First pick in the 2010 draft!!!!

Actually, I was thinking that when determining draft status and playoff seedings, a tie counts as one, half a win and one, half a loss. So a team that would go 0-0-16 would actually be looked at as a 8-8 team. I might be completely wrong but I thought I remember reading that last year when the Eagles where trying to make the playoffs over the Cowboys.

As for what a record like that entails? I have no clue and really could care less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

From everything I have read, wins count first. So a team that is 10-6 is better than one that is 9-6-1 since it is first total number of wins that matter. If 2 teams have the same number of wins, then the team with the fewer losses is seeded next.

So being 0-0-16 would put you behind everyone who had at least 1 win. You would be ahead of only teams without a win but with at least 1 loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Great point.    I would lke to add that there is another QB on the roster who was terrible over the middle--Kenny Pickett.  
    • MHS831
      Strength of Schedule

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I don't think this is the year for Carolina, unfortunately.  I think they will have to make a decision on the QB position-all we know is that Bryce has year 5, but a long term deal has not been signed--yet--and they would be smart to take a "wait and see" approach.  I have not kept up, and I see a path to upside for Bryce, but I do not think we have aggressively pursued a QB when our QB was mediocre to worse than mediocre.  yes, his numbers are improving--but he has adapted by eliminating what he does poorly and not improving on what he does poorly.  Just my take and I have no data to support this view.   Basically, we go as Bryce goes, so the approach is not to bring in a QB to have him compete until we find one, but it is to make Bryce as good as he can be--is that good enough? Season ticket holders buy the hope of winning rings, not winning 8 games. Last year, Bryce had a resurgence.  Take away TMac and Rico Dowdle.  How good was he?  I still have hope.  Not a hater of plan A, but a hater because we have no plan B.
    • BrewerHouseBeer
      The Carolina Huddle

      By BrewerHouseBeer · Posted

      Yeah man, I've been here for a very very long time. Couldn't even begin to tell you what year. Maybe 2004 or 5? I've never really been super active, just enjoy reading everyone's opinions and discussions. I'll chime in from time to time. I have had a few different accounts over the years. It's always been a fun place for me to check in on my favorite team. Hopefully we can keep the place running for a long while still. I also would like to recommend bringing back the Lovely Ladies page!
×
×
  • Create New...