Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney is "the worst GM in the NFL"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Hurney would have back loaded the hell out of Matt's contract and we would truly be fuged.  He still has time to do that unfortunately.  The man is a lose cannon.

There is zero doubt in my mind.

First, he wouldn't have been able to front load it, as we would be bumping the cap, and then we would be stuck with him for 4 years, minimum...just like all his other contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

There is zero doubt in my mind.

First, he wouldn't have been able to front load it, as we would be bumping the cap, and then we would be stuck with him for 4 years, minimum...just like all his other contracts.

Hurney had no choice but to backload contracts because otherwise there never would have been enough cap space. 

We were always right up against it from early on in Hurney's career. But instead of doing anything to fix it (like he easily could have done in the uncapped year) he just kept kicking the problem down the road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Hurney had no choice but to backload contracts because otherwise there never would have had enough cap space. 

We were always right up against it from early on in Hurney's career. But instead of doing anything to fix it (like he easily could have done in the uncapped year) he just kept kicking the problem down the road.

I can't tell you (although you probably remember) how many times I use the term "can kicker" on this board back in the day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the Hurney hate.  I do.  But you have to understand that he wasn't  necessarily the author of this family-feeling thing that some people are suggesting was the priority over business. JR was the mastermind behind that. Wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't behind the "ticking time bomb" philosophy as well. 

On a really off note,  I could justify or assail a Josh Gordon signing from a business standpoint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theballboy said:

We should keep Hurney around for the sole purpose of drafting the 1st round pick. Do not let him do anything else.

To be honest, none of his picks in the 1st, outside of Cam and possibly Gamble, are the risky 1st rounder types.

 

DE, OT, LB, RB etc....back in the day OT's were the bread and butter, they didn't fail like we see them today...and LB's and RB's typically make immediate impacts in the NFL...lot's of times day 1 starters.

We don't see many S's, WR's, CB's TE's etc...the picks that were harder to judge back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Once again, that contract isn't nearly as bad as everyone in the media, and for that matter on this board are spouting about, but don't let facts stand in the way.

This was essentially a 2 year, $30M deal.  That contract was structured so we could cut Matt after 2 years with very little pain...of if you want it in real terms...exactly the opposite of how Hurney normally structures his contracts.

How is a 14.7M cap hit if we cut him after this year categorized as “very little pain”. The TRUTH is we really haven’t begun paying for Kalil yet. His cap hit was only 3.4M this year. And 6.9M in 2018. In 2019, it’s either pay him 12.9M or cut him and eat 14.7M. The pain hasn’t even started. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I get the Hurney hate.  I do.  But you have to understand that he wasn't  necessarily the author of this family-feeling thing that some people are suggesting was the priority over business. JR was the mastermind behind that. Wouldn't be surprised if he wasn't behind the "ticking time bomb" philosophy as well. 

Saying that he was a Richardson puppet doesn't really make him any better though.

To be a Yes Man, you have to be willing to be a Yes Man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, theballboy said:

We should keep Hurney around for the sole purpose of drafting the 1st round pick. Do not let him do anything else.

Even that doesn't justify keeping him around.  You guys give him way too much credit for that.  It's much easier to hit on a decent player when you are contently have a high pick.  It doesn't require much knowledge you do that.  Ask yourself why we were in the position to have a top 10 pick on a regular basis to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s not new. That particular claim has largely disappeared because it has become untenable, but a few games into his rookie year when the playbook/gameplan/personnel/everything was terrible there was endless claims, posts, even threads made that Bryce Young was physically incapable of throwing the ball 20 yards downfield in the NFL. It was also argued that physically throwing the ball 20 yards in the NFL was somehow different than college. Once he threw the ball 20 yards, the goal posts moved to 30 yards, etc. I’m not going to use the search function for you, the point wasn’t as much that one claim as it was that that was one claim out of many that has made it very difficult to have a reasonable discussion here.
    • I mean, I can get a ball downfield 40 yards.  There would be a couple massive issues with me doing it.   My ball placement would be off the charts bad.  Second, for me to get it 40 yards I'm gonna have to moon it......which would give DBs the opportunity to make plays on balls that wouldn't exist if a better QB were throwing it.  Which is all an exaggerated explanation of the Bryce issue.  To many play the literal game w/ Bryce when it comes defending him.  Every NFL QB likely can loft one up around 50 yards.  Every QB in the NFL can't get a ball 30 yards downfield in the same windows.  Or the same ball placement.  That's the Bryce issue.    But I also think mixed into that is just his QB DNA.    Take a young Brees, it was in his DNA to stress defenses and takes shots.  He would flat out be Delhomme-ish at times.  Which is coverage and assignment altering.  Brees would throw balls into triple coverage 40 yards downfield.  Is that smart? Sometimes it is.  Not because the play gets made but you force the secondary to play honest.  
    • Tbf were not going to the superbowl this year so the development of our young wr is invaluable  As a side note 5 of our wr are in their 2nd year or less ( t Mac, Coker, tremayne, horn, x)  It's def a promising youth movement
×
×
  • Create New...