Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical trade


Killa Cam 69

Recommended Posts

5th rounder or less only. However, it's not happening. Until we have new ownership in place, guys like Bryant, Gordon, etc. will continue to not be options. Also, Steelers aren't going to trade him. He'll play out the year and then walk in FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

5th rounder or less only. However, it's not happening. Until we have new ownership in place, guys like Bryant, Gordon, etc. will continue to not be options. Also, Steelers aren't going to trade him. He'll play out the year and then walk in FA.

A fifth won't get it done. 

They just may trade him.  I think the thought crossed their mind this season. If a divorce is imminent,  which I believe it is,  they may decide to explore their options. Historically,  they really haven't shown any tolerance for negativity within their ranks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, top dawg said:

A fifth won't get it done. 

They just may trade him.  I think the thought crossed their mind this season. If a divorce is imminent,  which I believe it is,  they may decide to explore their options. Historically,  they really haven't shown any tolerance for negativity within their ranks. 

If a 5th wouldn't get it done (which you're right it probably wouldn't), then I personally would pass because I don't think the value is there for anything more.

 

We'll see, but they could've traded him this year and rode it out and it seems likely they won't cave in to one player's demands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep, like I said, I don't mind guaranteeing them money, but make the contracts smaller amounts in order to minimize cap implications. I don't know about "half," the actual amounts, whether more or less than half, would have to be determined by the NFL and NFLPA (which will probably be highly contentious, if not "impossible").  I'm just for whatever leads to the best product on the field while also unaffecting my wallet. As an aside, the NFL owners are greedy bastards in my estimation. They're trying to keep a larger portion of the pie, but players' agents are greedy as well, and they've sewn seeds of greed among the players. It's not all their fault; we all know what our society has evolved into, but the NFL wants a bigger piece of our smaller pocketbooks and refuses to "negotiate" with us (that's why we don't have cheaper and more reasonable à la carte options to view games that they're gradually trying to migrate to paid TV), so fu<k 'em. And then on top of that we have guys trying to water down the product even more by feeding greed. Change the way things are done so that we can at least see players prove themselves on the field without throwing wrenches into the engine that pays guys that have proven they can play on a pro level.
    • So if one of the parents wants to buy the theatre group or the band lunch they should get banned?
×
×
  • Create New...