Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers met with Josh Allen


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Mentioned by Ian Rapoport during Senior Bowl coverage on NFL Network...

So yes, we've met with one first round quarterback, possibly others.

Of course, teams generally do their due diligence on players like this even if they're not expected to fall to you. And if you look back at prior Senior Bowls, you'll find we've met with quarterbacks pretty much every year.

Okay?

Now feel free to freak out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Krovvy said:

I think this says more about Anderson than Cam.

Well you don’t really meet with an expected top 10 QB or even first round QBs to draft as a backup... Only if you’ve got a QB approaching 40 or you want a starter.

Basically I don’t think it says anything at all about our QBs, just us meeting with one because there’s no reason not to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Allen has been lobbying to go number one overall to the Browns (and he might). He wants to be known as "the guy who turned that program around".

Definitely competitive, and perhaps a tad cocky.

He comes off as a good kid though. He talks a lot about the work ethic of his farmer dad and says that's who he wants to be like.

I wish him good luck on his career, but it won't be with us.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Well you don’t really meet with an expected top 10 QB or even first round QBs to draft as a backup... Only if you’ve got a QB approaching 40 or you want a starter.

Basically I don’t think it says anything at all about our QBs, just us meeting with one because there’s no reason not to.

If the Panthers were to draft a QB of the future (and I don't think they will) the ideal target might be Mason Rudolph. He's a Rock Hill kid and a consummate nice guy who, from what I've seen, is expected to go mid first round, maybe higher.

If he were to drop to pick 24, I think you'd definitely have to look at him. I seriously doubt he'll drop that far, so you'd probably have to trade up to get him.

Mind you, stranger things have happened, but this would shock me enough that I'd probably have to worry about someone stepping on my tongue when my jaw drops to the floor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Well you don’t really meet with an expected top 10 QB or even first round QBs to draft as a backup... Only if you’ve got a QB approaching 40 or you want a starter.

Basically I don’t think it says anything at all about our QBs, just us meeting with one because there’s no reason not to.

I think its due diligence on players plus it might give you information on other guys.  The center at Wyoming is a late round prospect and it wouldn't hurt understanding interaction.  Not saying that is the primary reason but might as well be thorough.  How many times do you hear about teams going to scout a player but finding the diamond in the rough when doing so. 

 

Just my.02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Bj-Monster23 said:

I'm with it not saying I want to replace Cam because I don't. Cam is still a top 5 QB just need more pieces. The Panthers are just doing their due diligence. We also play Cleveland next season. 

Top 5? No...He most certainly is not. Can he be? Yes...but he was ranked like 20 this year? He has a lot to work on.

Huddlers get so stuck in the past. Right now, he sucks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charley Casserly also pointed out something I hadn't thought about.

Free agency.

"Personalities don't change" Casserly said, so what a lot of teams do is interview guys that they may not need now, but might be interested in down the road.  If the time comes that they're available, teams can go back to their Senior Bowl interviews to look at what they thought of them back when.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If the Panthers were to draft a QB of the future (and I don't think they will) the ideal target might be Mason Rudolph. He's a Rock Hill kid and a consummate nice guy who, from what I've seen, is expected to go mid first round, maybe higher.

If he were to drop to pick 24, I think you'd definitely have to look at him. I seriously doubt he'll drop that far, so you'd probably have to trade up to get him.

Mind you, stranger things have happened, but this would shock me enough that I'd probably have to worry about someone stepping on my tongue when my jaw drops to the floor.

eh, I think Rudolph will go in the 2nd. We cant use a first round pick on a QB. Cam Is still 29 man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Lumps said:

Top 5? No...He most certainly is not. Can he be? Yes...but he was ranked like 20 this year? He has a lot to work on.

Huddlers get so stuck in the past. Right now, he sucks.

 

His numbers suffered this year because he had to carry the run game despite us drafting an RB 8th overall the same year.

Are you slow in the head?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If the Panthers were to draft a QB of the future (and I don't think they will) the ideal target might be Mason Rudolph. He's a Rock Hill kid and a consummate nice guy who, from what I've seen, is expected to go mid first round, maybe higher.

If he were to drop to pick 24, I think you'd definitely have to look at him. I seriously doubt he'll drop that far, so you'd probably have to trade up to get him.

Mind you, stranger things have happened, but this would shock me enough that I'd probably have to worry about someone stepping on my tongue when my jaw drops to the floor.

Sorry Scot but there's ZERO chance we draft a QB first round UNLESS we're deciding to move on from Cam definitively. Which ain't happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tanking in the NFL isn’t really a thing and anybody wanting to bring the rigged lottery to the NFL has an ulterior motive.
    • I understand where you're coming from, but we need another safety IMHO. Other positions, especially on defense, dont have ideal depth, but to me at least S is the one position we can't stand pat at even when thinking about the future
    • 100%. Nick Scott was awful last year. Like, even for a franchise that hasn't historically invested in that position, it stood out for how awful it was. If he sees meaningful snaps at S again we're cooked.  Maybe he has value for ST, but I certainly hope we can upgrade. Jordan Fuller, who was by all accounts an Evero guy, was almost as bad. Xavier Woods was bad, but not complete garbage. Still did not want him back. Those 3 guys seriously may have been the worst S group in the NFL. And they all were brought in, especially Fuller, as good fits for this system. Everyone knocks the defensive line, and they deserve a lot of blame, too, but so, so many times our safeties inability to tackle let 4-5 yard runs turn into 10+. And it happened over and over and over again if you watch the film. Honestly, Demani Richardson was the only S by the end of the year I remember making positive plays. I have no issue with Richardson being in the mix and/or competing to be a starter, but we still need another S desperately IMHO who has actually played meaningful snaps in the NFL. The only caveat/excuse for our secondary was the fact our pass rush was nonexistent for large stretches last year. Maybe that helps with coverage, but I dont see how that makes any of these guys better at tackling.  I know it somewhat feels like piling on at this point, but I feel 100% confident in saying this was the worst tackling team in franchise history. The 70ish yard pass play we gave up to Jamarr Chase where he ran through and past everyone in the secondary has to be up there in terms of most embarrassing plays I've ever seen. I can't imagine how embarrassed Kuechly must have been watching from the booth... I think bringing back Evero was a mistake, but for a team that has had nothing but change over the past 5 years, I'm willing to see this through. I definitely think we added significantly to the floor of this defense with the additions we made. I dont think Evero has any further excuses if he cant field a unit that can at least somewhat hold their own. Fixing the safety play is going to be a big part of that.
×
×
  • Create New...