Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cloverfield Series


The Lobo

Recommended Posts

Anyone watch the new one on Netflix yet? I am a huge fan of the series and the whole story outside the movies. For those of you who don’t know google that poo. Clover field ARG (alternate reality game) is a bunch of websites with clues, codes to decipher, hidden secrets in the movies and other plot points not mentioned in the story. Each movie is connected, yet somewhat not connected. Great story telling in and out of the movie. The fact that the releases are so secretive and sudden make these movies more fun. Rumor is, a fourth cloverfield movie will be released this summer and it centers around WW2 and allied forces fighting nazi experiments...awesome.

another fun fact: the last two were passed up scripts that JJ Abrams company picked up and turned them into cloverfield movies. 

Anyway, let me know what you all though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, GRWatcher said:

https://observationdeck.kinja.com/ignore-the-cloverfield-part-of-the-cloverfield-paradox-1822718194

I didn't like either of the first movies. Will definitely never watch the first one again. I thought the web games were cool until I watched the movie. Think I'll skip this one.

That’s fair, but please don’t listen to the article. This movie is what connects the movies. I will admit, the second one really had nothing to do with the first, other than the fact that John Goodman’s character worked for a company mentioned in cloverfield 1. This movie deals with alternate realities and rips in space time. The monster at the end had everything to do with the other movies and shows that what happened in this movie, led to the events in the first two. Anyway, if you are bored one day, it’s worth a watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the first 2 and was excited to hear that this was out on Netflix after the SB. Was going to watch it last night until I read everywhere how horrible it was. I couldn't find one positive thing that was said. Basically said Netflix bought it dirt cheap because no movie distributor wanted to touch it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t listen to critics who have had a bone to pick with 1) Netflix movies in general as i believe there is a concerted effort to blast movies like this and Bright to kill Netflix hope into feature films. And 2) because the release of this movie was so direct and fast critics didn’t get there special treatment where they got to watch it first. 

 

The critics against this movie have never been more meaningless because people don’t have to read the reviews they can just watch it for themselves.

 

ive loved every single cloverfield movie. The first one is in my top 5 all time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

Don’t listen to critics who have had a bone to pick with 1) Netflix movies in general as i believe there is a concerted effort to blast movies like this and Bright to kill Netflix hope into feature films. And 2) because the release of this movie was so direct and fast critics didn’t get there special treatment where they got to watch it first. 

 

The critics against this movie have never been more meaningless because people don’t have to read the reviews they can just watch it for themselves.

 

ive loved every single cloverfield movie. The first one is in my top 5 all time. 

ha, it is in my bottom three.  It did have a great trailer though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

I loved it. The experience and the mystery of that whole movie left me in aw. 

 

Just curious, how old were you when you saw it?

I saw it in theaters so assume it was around when it came out, would have made me 26.

That is the great thing about movies though, they all have their audience.  My favorite (Cloud Atlas) is loathed by probably one-third of those that have seen it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goondal said:

I saw it in theaters so assume it was around when it came out, would have made me 26.

That is the great thing about movies though, they all have their audience.  My favorite (Cloud Atlas) is loathed by probably one-third of those that have seen it.

I guess to me it was the first true monster movie of my generation. I must have been 14 when I saw it. I didn’t grow up with Godzilla or Frankenstein or Dracula or King Kong.

 

The websites and the viral media surrounding the release and not knowing what the monster was until you were in the theater was so cool. 

 

I guess older people didnt like the way it was filmed though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CarolinaCoolin said:

I guess to me it was the first true monster movie of my generation. I must have been 14 when I saw it. I didn’t grow up with Godzilla or Frankenstein or Dracula or King Kong.

 

The websites and the viral media surrounding the release and not knowing what the monster was until you were in the theater was so cool. 

 

I guess older people didnt like the way it was filmed though

Possibly.  I do remember looking forward to it because the preview was really good, one of the better ones I have seen.  Made you want to see it without giving anything away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Goondal said:

Possibly.  I do remember looking forward to it because the preview was really good, one of the better ones I have seen.  Made you want to see it without giving anything away.

It came out in 2008 but it was still not that far removed from 9/11 so seeing the Statue of Liberty head getting thrown through nyc was crazy to see

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...