Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The case to release Ryan Kalil, JStew, and CJ


MHS831

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I don't play the "He could miss a lot of time" game. 

He's the leader along the line, is still one of the best centers in the league.  

He's more than worth it. 

It's not that he "could" miss a lot of games. Anyone could miss a lot of games. It's that his recent history says that he's very likely to miss a lot of games. These are things you have to consider before you eat a $10M cap hit and let a top young OG walk. Would you rather have an injury prone aging center for one more year or Norwell for the next 4-5? That might be the decision we're faced with. IMO it's an absolute no-brainer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Ryan Kalil has missed 18 games in 2 seasons, playing in a total of 15 games (including playoffs) at a cost of over $20m.  Worth it? 

2017 6 games

2016 8 games

http://www.nfl.com/player/ryankalil/2495655/profile

Ryan has already announced his plan to play another season, which if you follow the recent trend, means we should expect 4 games from him.  (kidding?) His cap figure  is over $10m, but we save about $7m for  sending him away now. 

http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/carolina-panthers/ryan-kalil-1229/

Jonathan Stewart Has averaged more than 4 yards per carry 2 of the last 6 seasons, and his progress is aligned with the research about the decline of running backs.  http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/123542/inside-slant-running-back-cliff-after-age-27

Using this as a basic formula, Stewart, whose total yardage is higher than the average, is likely to average somewhere between 3.0 and 3.2 yards per carry in 2018.  During Stewart's first five season, he averaged close to 5.0 yards per carry.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_/id/11247/jonathan-stewart

Charles Johnson made or assisted in 54 tackles and had 4 sacks--over the past 3 seasons.  To put that into perspective, the three seasons before that, he had 113 tackles and 32 sacks.  Wes Horton, fwiw,  playing behind CJ over the past 3 seasons (fewer snaps) had 35 tackles and 9 sacks over the same 3-year period.  

http://www.nfl.com/player/charlesjohnson/2507187/profile

Cap Savings to release all 3 players: approximately $13.75m

  • Ryan Kalil: $6.8 m
  • Charles Johnson: $3.25 m
  • Jonathan Stewart: $3.7 m

While Marty would never release his "big name" draft picks, a new GM might.

also worth noting, his back up did a dang fine job

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, aging players who become injury prone late in their careers often find the fountain of youth and all of a sudden become reliable again.

Stop being dumb.

Dumb is saying a player is going to get hurt again based on his previous injuries. 

I got news for you,  every player can get hurt any year in the NFL. That's the reality of it.

His age doesn't concern me, as centers can play well into their late 30's.

We only have him one more year, so you'll get your wish soon enough.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

AGREED.  Which is why you could not do both.  Release Kalil and pay Norwell. 

Kalil getting released would have a very very minimal impact on signing Norwell. Unfortunately it’s unlikely we put that much cap space into two guards regardless of what we do with other players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Dumb is saying a player is going to get hurt again based on his previous injuries. 

I got news for you,  every player can get hurt any year in the NFL. That's the reality of it.

His age doesn't concern me, as centers can play well into their late 30's.

We only have him one more year, so you'll get your wish soon enough.

 

Do you understand probability? Because you're speaking in concrete terms while I'm speaking in terms of probability. 

Ryan missed half a season last year because he woke up with a crick in his neck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mjligon said:

Adams was literally the only person in our secondary who brought it every single week. He may be a dinosaur, but he isn’t going anywhere.

If we can retain him yes, but his role should be limited since his speed and explosiveness is gone. I have seen a lot of plays where he was beat on coverage due to speed and that’s not gonna cut it vs NFCS WRs.

 

Need a tall & rangy safety with speed  as a starter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Do you understand probability? Because you're speaking in concrete terms while I'm speaking in terms of probability. 

Ryan missed half a season last year because he woke up with a crick in his neck.

Do you understand he won't be cut? Definitely not before the draft.

He'll most likely be on the roster this up coming season. 

No matter how you feel about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

CJ and Stew should definitely be considered for cuts. But Kalil is too good to cut despite his cost. Cutting him is a big risk for Cam Newton. Not a wise move to save pennies when we already need to consider replacements for Norwell and possibly Matt Kalil.

I would agree if there weren't huge cap savings to be had by moving on from Kalil, but there are. He missed 10 games last year. We rushed for 100+ yards in 8 of those 10 games. We also failed to rush for 100+ yards in 2 of the 7 games when Kalil started. We averaged 2.4 sacks allowed with Kalil. We averaged 2.2 sacks allowed without Kalil. We had 300+ yards of total offense in 5 of the 10 games Kalil missed. We had 300+ yards of total offense in 3 of the 7 games Kalil played.

I thought that the OL played better with Kalil out there, but honestly there's not much if anything in the way of the stats to show it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...