Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sobering Reality


Shocker

Recommended Posts

Looked this up...the Charlotte franchise in their history has 23 playoff wins.  Original Hornets began play in 1988.  Charlotte has 3 playoff wins since 2004...Bobcats first season.

Also if you take Kemba out of the equation we have drafted busts literally almost every draft since the Bobcats intital season.  :crying:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Looked this up...the Charlotte franchise in their history has 23 playoff wins.  Original Hornets began play in 1988.  Charlotte has 3 playoff wins since 2004...Bobcats first season.

Also if you take Kemba out of the equation we have drafted busts literally almost every draft since the Bobcats intital season.  :crying:

Worse than the Browns smh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

we are quietly tanking right now.. we have abandoned the idea of making the playoffs and are all about improving draft position - even without trading away assets or changing personnel.. it's obvious

 

Don't need to do it quietly when you continue to trot Batum out there as a starter night after night. The guy is the conductor of the tank train. How the fug do you go 0-10 in 26 minutes? How is Clifford this fuging stubborn. The guy is going down with the ship.

This is looking like Tyrus Thomas 2.0 but we don't have the amnesty clause anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/10/2018 at 11:01 PM, Goondal said:

Outside of Kemba, there cannot be a worse franchise the last fifteen years

I wonder what the winning % is of all sports teams since the Bobcats began.  

 

Since the Bobcats began, their win pct. is .387. Minnesota is .361, and Sacramento is .377.

The Browns are at .276

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...