Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Every GM Drafting rankings over thier tenure


CarolinaSamurai

Recommended Posts

I know a guy who works in psychology for emergency services - basically, he's the "talk you off the rooftop" guy - and he says this sort of scenario is more common than people think. Sporting events can be major triggers and these incidents spike at those times. One minute a guy is watching the big game with his family, then his team loses (or in this case, wins), and all of a sudden he's got a shotgun to his wife's head, he's holding the kids hostage, he's screaming obscenities at the negotiator, the whole nine yards. (Luckily, the success rate for negotiation in these situations is quite high, as I hope would be the case for any Huddlers.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every GM makes good decisions and bad decisions. By several metrics, Hurney has proven to be better than most GMs. He was part of building 2 different Super Bowl teams. Throwing a brand new GM in there right before the draft is a terrible decision. Anyone who is hired now is going to be trying to impress the new owner - Hurney or anyone else. If you don't knock this offseason out of the park, you probably aren't getting another year. Hurney has made some very good moves since coming back. Letting him get a shot at it makes a ton of sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Every GM makes good decisions and bad decisions. By several metrics, Hurney has proven to be better than most GMs. He was part of building 2 different Super Bowl teams. Throwing a brand new GM in there right before the draft is a terrible decision. Anyone who is hired now is going to be trying to impress the new owner - Hurney or anyone else. If you don't knock this offseason out of the park, you probably aren't getting another year. Hurney has made some very good moves since coming back. Letting him get a shot at it makes a ton of sense.

Wow, a reasonable post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Every GM makes good decisions and bad decisions. By several metrics, Hurney has proven to be better than most GMs. He was part of building 2 different Super Bowl teams. Throwing a brand new GM in there right before the draft is a terrible decision. Anyone who is hired now is going to be trying to impress the new owner - Hurney or anyone else. If you don't knock this offseason out of the park, you probably aren't getting another year. Hurney has made some very good moves since coming back. Letting him get a shot at it makes a ton of sense.

you can basically say the same thing for many GMs who got fired for incompetency if the team reached a superbowl berth after they left

but i’m sure you haven’t even heard of most of their names.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Wolfcop said:

Every GM makes good decisions and bad decisions. By several metrics, Hurney has proven to be better than most GMs. He was part of building 2 different Super Bowl teams. Throwing a brand new GM in there right before the draft is a terrible decision. Anyone who is hired now is going to be trying to impress the new owner - Hurney or anyone else. If you don't knock this offseason out of the park, you probably aren't getting another year. Hurney has made some very good moves since coming back. Letting him get a shot at it makes a ton of sense.

The only metric that actually matters is whether the teams that you build win or lose.

In eleven seasons, Hurney only built three winning teams. Two of those came while the roster still had a heavy influence from George Seifert. The third got absolutely humiliated in the playoffs.

The only way that you can call Hurney a good GM is by focusing on a particular subset of something he did, then narrowing the criteria to the point where it suits the argument. That's basically equivalent to taking an essay that got a kid a failing grade and pointing out that he had good punctuation.

The overall roster building is the only thing that matters. Marty is terrible at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The only metric that actually matters is whether the teams that you build win or lose.

In eleven seasons, Hurney only built three winning teams. Two of those came while the roster still had a heavy influence from George Seifert. The third got absolutely humiliated in the playoffs.

The only way that you can call Hurney a good GM is by focusing on a particular subset of something he did, then narrowing the criteria to the point where it suits the argument. That's basically equivalent to taking an essay that got a kid a failing grade and pointing out that he had good punctuation.

The overall roster building is the only thing that matters. Marty is terrible at it.

Hey bud, I have read your posts in about 200+ threads, and they do express how much dislike you have JR and MH, but I think it's time you stop beating the dead horse. 

We get it, you don't like them, but your constant bickering really takes away from what you could really offer to the message board. You are losing your normal "great contributor" and turning into "Nancy, the office intern everyone hates because she/he just gripes about her/his personal issues. (gender equality proof)"

Your stance is obvious, but now that things are already in motion, you should avoid getting worked up and start posting like you used to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Hey bud, I have read your posts in about 200+ threads, and they do express how much dislike you have JR and MH, but I think it's time you stop beating the dead horse. 

We get it, you don't like them, but your constant bickering really takes away from what you could really offer to the message board. You are losing your normal "great contributor" and turning into "Nancy, the office intern everyone hates because she/he just gripes about her/his personal issues. (gender equality proof)"

Your stance is obvious, but now that things are already in motion, you should avoid getting worked up and start posting like you used to.

Nah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney's drafts between 2009-2011 were dreadful.  Trading a 1st round pick to select Brown.  Fiammetta in the 4th round.  Clausen.  The only good players we came away from those 3 drafts combined were Munnerlyn, Hardy, and Newton.  I guess LaFell if you wanna count him.  How in one of the most loaded drafts ever (2011) we only came away with 1 contributor (albeit Newton) is sad.  We weren't even getting good depth players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Mage said:

Hurney's drafts between 2009-2011 were dreadful.  Trading a 1st round pick to select Brown.  Fiammetta in the 4th round.  Clausen.  The only good players we came away from those 3 drafts combined were Munnerlyn, Hardy, and Newton.  I guess LaFell if you wanna count him.  How in one of the most loaded drafts ever (2011) we only came away with 1 contributor (albeit Newton) is sad.  We weren't even getting good depth players.

People seem to ignore 2002-2008. Hurney wasn’t hired in 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mage said:

Hurney's drafts between 2009-2011 were dreadful.  Trading a 1st round pick to select Brown.  Fiammetta in the 4th round.  Clausen.  The only good players we came away from those 3 drafts combined were Munnerlyn, Hardy, and Newton.  I guess LaFell if you wanna count him.  How in one of the most loaded drafts ever (2011) we only came away with 1 contributor (albeit Newton) is sad.  We weren't even getting good depth players.

Man, I don't think many GM's hit after round 2 in that draft. 1st round was very loaded, but after that the talent becomes average at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • with arm strength people often get stuck on the distance  arm strength in the NFL is moreso measured in speed / velocity .which of course is how long does it take for  the ball to travel from the time of release until it reaches its target ? & u beat world class speed with more speed on the ball...just saying  
    • No GM hits 100%. I'm well aware. But what a GM has to do is look at the roster, what's available, and future contracts and go from there. XL was a one season wonder in college. He has speed. Who cares. He body catches and his hands are bricks. Speed doesn't matter when you don't actually have the ball. There were other receivers available with better resumes. XL was a project. Fitts loved projects. You don't have the luxury of projects when you just traded away DJ for a QB. 1st round WRs need to contribute now.  Brooks was a luxury RB pick we didn't have the luxury to make. Who cares if Dallas was going to pick him. We had holes all over our defense. Chuba was coming off a fresh contract. We just inked 150m interior line and then centered it by moving a guard to center that had suffered 2 season ending injuries. The most critical area on our line was being held together by a bandaid and a prayer. No surprise when it didn't work.   Wallace is getting better but Wilson was sitting there waiting to be taken. DPOY for college football right there for the taking. That was a gimme pick. If you're going to take a risk on an injured player, the 3rd round for Wilson made a whole lot more sense at a position we were rest stop TP thin at.  4th round and on aren't going to be heavy contributors unless you're lucky.  He did well on the trade for Jackson. Coker, I believe he offered the largest guarantee. He actually got more than some late round picks make.  Those 1st 3 picks, IMO, were straight up whiffs.  Looking back at Fitterer's picks, I think he tried to plug holes because we had a ton of them. Problem was, he wasn't very good at it and he loved RAS scores and developmental players with a coach that couldn't develop a Polaroid. He tried to do too much. He was impatient. His other problem was he panicked during the draft and couldn't read or understand the flow of how drafts tend to go. DJ Johnson was the prime example. We needed an edge rusher and he jumped in at the end of the run instead of starting it.  Morgan's first year looked exactly like Fitts to me. Lots of projects.  2nd year looks better.  We'll see how 3rd year goes. FA also plays into all of this as well but that's a whole different topic of how it played out and planning with regard to drafting. 
    • I judge how good our players are by the way a defense covers them. XL draws no special coverage. Coker on the other hand always has a man over the top. It still doesn’t matter. You be the judge.
×
×
  • Create New...