Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bad news for that other Jerry

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Gregg S Enthusiast

Gregg S

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

 

22 minutes ago, Bartin said:

Apparently it's not a fine, but a cost of expenses incurred by the other owners based on his actions and Jones has pay that back. Like if a judge made you pay attorneys fees for the other party in the lawsuit because you were clearly in the wrong.

Well, at least that makes a little more sense....kinda sorta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Might not mean anything regarding Richardson, but I have to admit it does make me wonder if the league would want to penalize him higher than what we expect.

If disagreeing with the commissioner's salary is "conduct detrimental", what are sexual harassment, racism and failure to report non-disclosure agreements?

How do you fine someone for disagreeing with salary. I think the NFL is going to get slapped with a civil suit if they do fine him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

See the other posts.  It's not a fine.  They're looking to force him to pay their legal costs.

Lol then they would have to sue him. Are they? You can't just make up rules as you go. I kinda agree with JJ that 5 guys shouldn't be the end all for who comish is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, Snake said:

Lol then they would have to sue him. Are they? You can't just make up rules as you go. 

From above...

5 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This isn't about money, this is about dick swinging.

All I know is that when Jerry Jones and the NFL office are at odds, entertainment usually follows.

I tend to agree.  It's not about the money so much as an "I'll show you what happens when you #$%& with me" sort of thing.

You know, the kind of thing @Jeremy Igo does from time to time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Paa Langfart Grand Master

Paa Langfart

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Might not mean anything regarding Richardson, but I have to admit it does make me wonder if the league would want to penalize him higher than what we expect.

If disagreeing with the commissioner's salary is "conduct detrimental", what are sexual harassment, racism and failure to report non-disclosure agreements?

I am calling you out right here and now as a fake phony fan.  Every chance you get you have some thing detrimental to say about the ownership or the team in general.  Don't know what has crawled up your  myoptic rectum the past few months but  get the fug off this Panthers Forum your jack assed nerd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bewonee Newbie

bewonee

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Might not mean anything regarding Richardson, but I have to admit it does make me wonder if the league would want to penalize him higher than what we expect.

If disagreeing with the commissioner's salary is "conduct detrimental", what are sexual harassment, racism and failure to report non-disclosure agreements?

Is racism punishable by Goodell? Does saying a slur on one occasion out of nearly 25 years of owning the team while being speculated that he isn't in his right mind anymore due to age equal racism? Not in my book. Also, a few offhanded comments isn't harassment. Give him a break, this is an old man that you are vigorously attacking with little to no context and almost no full details who isn't thought to be thinking clearly anymore. I am not going to excuse him, but you people are acting legit soulless on here. It's just a game at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherOnTheProwl1523 Mentor

PantherOnTheProwl1523

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, bewonee said:

Give him a break, this is an old man that you are vigorously attacking with little to no context and almost no full details who isn't thought to be thinking clearly anymore. I am not going to excuse him, but you people are acting legit soulless on here. It's just a game at the end of the day.

JJ is a just a drunken womanizing lush and just because he is old is an excuse to lay off this guy when he put himself in this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...