Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Panthers Have *Serious* Interest In S Tyrann Mathieu


Saca312

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, joeyxfresco said:

I really think we restructure Cam or back load the Poe and potential Mathieu deal 

Rapaport already said Poe is 8 million a year. So that drops our cap to 9 million.

I seriously doubt Cam is going to get restructured. That dude is going to play out this contract and get paid either here or somewhere else. We all know Cam. 

Mathieu I doubt is going to go less then 6-8 this season, most likely a lot more. 

I mean if your comfortable not paying our rookies and going into the season with zero cap money. More power to you. 

That or we got to trade someone good and clear up some space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

Rapaport already said Poe is 8 million a year. So that drops our cap to 9 million.

I seriously doubt Cam is going to get restructured. That dude is going to play out this contract and get paid either here or somewhere else. We all know Cam. 

Mathieu I doubt is going to go less then 6-8 this season, most likely a lot more. 

I mean if your comfortable not paying our rookies and going into the season with zero cap money. More power to you. 

That or we got to trade someone good and clear up some space.

Yea but what’s one year on a restructured contract with a solid chance to win a SB? That’ll also mean he gets paid more throughout the rest of his deal. I also think we extend him after everyone retires after this season anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Rapaport already said Poe is 8 million a year. So that drops our cap to 9 million.

I seriously doubt Cam is going to get restructured. That dude is going to play out this contract and get paid either here or somewhere else. We all know Cam. 

Mathieu I doubt is going to go less then 6-8 this season, most likely a lot more. 

I mean if your comfortable not paying our rookies and going into the season with zero cap money. More power to you. 

That or we got to trade someone good and clear up some space.

What exactly do you mean by this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joeyxfresco said:

Yea but what’s one year on a restructured contract with a solid chance to win a SB? That’ll also mean he gets paid more throughout the rest of his deal. I also think we extend him after everyone retires after this season anyway 

How would you restructure his contract. He makes 20.7M a year 

For context Kirk Cousins makes 28.0M a year.

lets see what you got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, joeyxfresco said:

Yea but what’s one year on a restructured contract with a solid chance to win a SB? That’ll also mean he gets paid more throughout the rest of his deal. I also think we extend him after everyone retires after this season anyway 

Also there is no solid chance of winning a Super Bowl. To many variables this year. I hope we do for our vets and our fans. But we are going into this season with too many complete unknowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Also there is no solid chance of winning a Super Bowl. To many variables this year. I hope we do for our vets and our fans. But we are going into this season with too many complete unknowns.

I beg to differ. Anything is possible.

(edit: you said solid. i see that now.) but still! this is the NFL. What exactly is solid?

Eagles-Win-735x400.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...