Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Richardson group should pay PSL owners

Squirrel

By Squirrel,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

goodoleboy Newbie

goodoleboy

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, grateflday said:

Hopefully you won't have to worry about this.  I am a PSL owner myself, since 2002, and really don't think there will be a new stadium any time soon.  Despite its "age" the current stadium was built in a modern era way in that it has a lot of suites and lots of club seats, who also have a very nice indoor area to lounge and concessions.  There is also room inside to do more, plus the location is great, etc.  

AS it relates to not being able to support a new location.  Despite every game being sold out, if you go every Sunday you see all the empty seats.... SO we still have a fan base that wont buy single game tickets from others and then your going to ask 50k people to spend another $3k to $10k+ for a PSL of which we already spent that kind of money??  Not going to happen.  The fan base isn't here that can do that, there is no waiting list and not a large number of people try to get tickets as it is.  

This all being said,,,,, I won't be a peace until we have new owners and a new long term lease signed at the current place :shades:

No way PSLs for a new stadium would be priced at $3-10K. Those are 1990's prices. My guess is double that at least. I have owned a couple since the first year. I got my moneys worth over the years with the memories. I won't buy them again. Its too easy to get tickets online now a days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arroz con Panther Contributor

Arroz con Panther

Posted
Posted

It's a little late, but I think I have an idea!

Instead of giving PSL owners money, they should give that money to Hurney so he can go out and get any free agent we want!

With all of the free agent threads earlier this month, I'm actually surprised this wasn't suggested earlier.

For those that couldn't tell, I'm being sarcastic. This is a dumb idea. It's like saying Samsung was sold and, since I own a Samsung TV, the purchasing company should give me money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PantherCam213 Collaborator

PantherCam213

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

right...as long as  you know you have no rights...stealing

I don't see much difference in this and a cell phone account.  Your original contract paid for the right to use "your" phone number, but you have to continue to pay the service amount (whatever the provider decides that is this year).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pimpdaddy Grand Master

Pimpdaddy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, PantherCam213 said:

I don't see much difference in this and a cell phone account.  Your original contract paid for the right to use "your" phone number, but you have to continue to pay the service amount (whatever the provider decides that is this year).

How every you want to justify it bruh...its always stacked against the consumer....thats why i dont have a PSL...pimping legalized...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KendrickPanther Apprentice

KendrickPanther

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, Asurfaholic said:

It’s an absurd idea.

of course they wouldn’t part with that kind of money there’s not even a question of whether or not the PSL owners are owed the money. This is looney and sounds like a bunch of entitled liberals to me. 

 

THE PSL WAS NOT AN INVESTMENT. It was a purchase of a license to have first dibs on a seat in a stadium.

 

PSL OWNERS DO NOT OWN ANY PORTION OF THE PANTHERS

 

NOBODY OWES THE PSL OWNERS ANYTHING.

Call Rush Limbaugh for your bs rants. I dont care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...