Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who are your top targets at 24


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Finally found the time to do enough research to narrow down my list of favorite potential targets for our 24th pick. 

WR, Calvin Ridley 

CB, Jaire Alexander

DE, Harold Landry.

Guard, Isiah Wynn

Interested to hear some more opinion's on this, so who are you hoping for at 24?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Finally found the time to do enough research to narrow down my list of favorite potential targets for our 24th pick. 

WR, Calvin Ridley 

CB, Jaire Alexander

DE, Harold Landry.

Guard, Isiah Wynn

Interested to hear some more opinion's on this, so who are you hoping for at 24?

 

 

 

I’d add Josh Jackson to this list and call it good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Finally found the time to do enough research to narrow down my list of favorite potential targets for our 24th pick. 

WR, Calvin Ridley 

CB, Jaire Alexander

DE, Harold Landry.

Guard, Isiah Wynn

Interested to hear some more opinion's on this, so who are you hoping for at 24?

 

 

 

 I think all of these are both a realistic possibility to be available and a fit for our team. For me:

 JJackson, DJMoore/Ridley, Reid, Daniels/Hernandez/Wynn.

I don’t know about Reid at 24 since safety is a deep position but obviously it’s a glaring need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO by the time we get to 24, the highest rated player on the board is going to be  a RB.  Especially if Barkley has been the only one taken.  Hurney has a history of back to back RBs in the first and two of our division rivals have reinvigorated their offenses with tantem backs.  Norv has a history of needing a true between the tackles RB and a choice between Guice, Michel, or Johnson will give him exactly what he wants.  None will be there in the second and I don’t see any evidence that CAP is that person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Troys99x3 said:

Realistic wish list: 

1) CB: Josh Jackson / Isaiah Oliver

2) OL: Hernandez / Wynn

3) DE: Harold Landry

4) S: Justin Reid

5) Pass catchers: Dallas Godhert, Christian Kirk

Any of the above and I'll be happy.

Good list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, sml1950 said:

IMO by the time we get to 24, the highest rated player on the board is going to be  a RB.  Especially if Barkley has been the only one taken.  Hurney has a history of back to back RBs in the first and two of our division rivals have reinvigorated their offenses with tantem backs.  Norv has a history of needing a true between the tackles RB and a choice between Guice, Michel, or Johnson will give him exactly what he wants.  None will be there in the second and I don’t see any evidence that CAP is that person.

IF RB is the choice it should be Guice by a fair amount, Johnson vision is in question and Sony has serious ball security issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

Calvin Ridley and Devin Funchess are basically the same age. That's a real concern if it takes Ridley a while to get adjusted to the pro game. 

Is it? Funchess has had 3 seasons now and little competition for his place. Despite injury he had a big share of targets and made 800 yards. I know he was injured but can we really justify paying the going rates for WRs on his next contract? Ridley has a solid floor and as a first round pick would be cheap for 5 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...